User talk:Zzrocket

This is Zzrocket's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Zzrocket, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zzrocket! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zzrocket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a confirmed sockpuppet of Bertrand101. Something was wrong and was just a mistake. I'm still monitoring and correcting edits on articles with good faith. ZZrocket 13:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confirmed to four other accounts, though. You have not addressed this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zzrocket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a confirmed sockpuppet of Bertrand101. Despite the fact that I'm confirmed to four other accounts (Aztegdude, etc.), I did a lot of good faith on edits and monitoring articles as well as removing suspicious hoaxes, especially removing edit hoaxes from Bertrand101. I apologize. I'll do my best for what's right. That's all. ZZrocket 14:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think the standard offer would apply here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:10, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal to unblock

@Bbb23 and DeltaQuad: On behalf of Aztegdude (talk · contribs) group (including other accounts like AkoyIanS and JayBustamante), unblock our accounts. This is a mistake. We're using a shared IP to do good faith edits on Philippine radio-related articles, as what WayKurat said in a comment. We're not actually sock accounts of Bertrand101 because we hate him and his suspicious hoaxes. We apologize. ZZrocket 09:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DYDW

The article DYDW has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing or inclusion in lists/directories) in multiple independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 07:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DYDW for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYDW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYDW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]