User talk:Zxoxm
Crime against humanity
[edit]Okay, we get that you are upset about water fluoridation, but you will get yourself blocked from Wikipedia if you make absurd claims such that the practice is a crime against humanity, as you just did. Your edit is stupid, not even controversial. The CDC in the U.S. calls water fluoridation one of the top 10 health achievements of the 20th century. One might not agree with the CDC's evaluation or with the technology, but to suggest that this practice is a "crime against humanity" calls into question your ability to discuss matters sensibly. Of course, Wikipedia might be part of the conspiracy in which case I am still waiting for my check for my participation. Your edits were way beyond silly, farsical, or helpful in any way. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Dean Burk, who discovered photosynthesis with Otto Heinrich Warburg, said that "fluoridation is a form of public mass murder" http://vlex.com/vid/john-yiamouyiannis-consumers-union-36956980#ixzz17sg3IYg3 http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1931/warburg.html (Zxoxm (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC))
http://openjurist.org/619/f2d/932/yiamouyiannis-v-consumers-union-of-united-states-inc#fn3
August 13, 2007: CDC faces ethics charges for failure to warn the public on fluoride's risks http://www.fluoridealert.org/ethics.html
Press Release from the Lille Center, Inc. http://www.fluoridealert.org/ethics.release.aug.13.2007.html
The CDC Ethics Complaint http://www.fluoridealert.org/cdc.ethics.complaint.aug.13.2007.pdf
ADA Cements Its Influence on CDC Fluoride Policy http://iaomt.com/news/archive.asp?intReleaseID=310&month=9&year=2009
Georgia Water Worker Fired For Refusing to Fluoridate http://iaomt.com/news/archive.asp?intReleaseID=288&month=12&year=2008
US EPA Union letter (pdf) to the Commissioners of the Water Utility http://fluoridealert.org/dalton.epa.letter.2008.pdf
http://www.fluoridealert.org/ http://iaomt.com/news/archive.asp?view=all
- Suggestion: you might want to put these (or other) statements about yourself or your interests/philosophy on your main user page User:Zxoxm. Most registered editors do something like that. No one else is supposed to edit your personal user page. --Smokefoot (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Dean Burk said that "fluoridation is a form of public mass murder" The 2 edits that editor Sandstein refers to on the mass murder page and the crimes against humanity page were going to link to the Dean Burk and water fluoridation information. One would have to be knowledgeable about the work that Dean Burk did with cancer and fluoridation to appreciate the significance of the edits Zxoxm made. One would also have to be knowledgeable about the suppression of science and politics surrounding water fluoridation to appreciate the scope of the context of the contributions Zxoxm is attempting to make to Wikipedia. William Marcus is a page that Wikipedia created and if you learned about his story at EPA you would be on your way to understanding the edits Zxoxm made. Someone that is not informed about fluoride beyond the politically correct story we all know about would look at my edits and think as those that defended the world being flat wish to silence me. Knowledge is a wonderful thing and I hope that you get educated about fluoride because Dean Burk was right when he said that it was a form of mass murder. And Zxoxm does consider mass murder to be a crime against humanity. Lead was defended once as fluoride is defended today. Instead of censoring people because you do are uninformed about a topic they are attempting to enlighten people about by editing Wikipedia you should try to educate yourself. Fluoride is not what you think it is and you either learn that or stay uninformed and essentially worthless.(Zxoxm (talk) 22:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC))
December 2010
[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ckatzchatspy 05:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC){{unblock|reason= How has Zxoxm done Block evasion? GeneralMandrakeRipper's account is not Zxoxm's account and was blocked. I do not know what the User:Freedom5000 user is or how that account is involved here. The Zxoxm account has been updating and creating Wikipedia articles that improve the site. What violations has Zxoxm done to be blocked? [[User:Zxoxm|Zxoxm]] ([[User talk:Zxoxm#top|talk]]) 21:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)}} {{unblock|reason=What is blocked the IP address or the user Zxoxm because I do not understand what is going on here exactly [[User:Zxoxm|Zxoxm]] ([[User talk:Zxoxm#top|talk]]) 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)}}
Zxoxm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I assure you that Zxoxm is not a sock puppet of of Freedom5000 as some editor is suggesting. Accusations of sock puppetry are not to be taken lightly on the Wikipedia site and Zxoxm denies any and all such sock puppet allegations. Please inform Zxoxm of your investigation findings so Zxoxm can respond accordingly to them. Zxoxm would like equal opportunity rights to edit Wikipedia. (Zxoxm (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)) Zxoxm (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Regardless of your assurances, the fact that Zxoxm, GeneralMandrakeRipper, and 5007a are all editing from the same IP, with the same computer configuration, on the same topic, is quite convincing evidence of your lack of honesty in this regard. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Zxoxm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Zxoxm denies any association to the sock puppet of Freedom5000 allegation. Zxoxm also did not say or attempt to say or assert that or imply or communicate or assure or provide assurances as you claim that GeneralMAndrakeRipper, 5007a and Zxoxm are editing from the same IP address, with the same computer configuriation, on the same topic which if you include the photosynthesis edits and the Whistleblower edits and that is not true . No Wikipedia editor has besides now in the decline reason text has asserted or communicated in any way understood by or known to Zxoxm that the IP address being used was of any significance in this blocked situation here. Zxoxm was defending the accusation on Zxoxm's home page that he was associated with Freedom5000 which is just not true. Zxoxm is requesting that the accusations be clearly brought forth so Zxoxm can respond. What is Zxoxm being blocked form editing Wikipedia for exactly now? Please note that Zxoxm has no recourse to recover Zxoxm's password if it was lost or destroyed which may have already happened. Is password recovery available for Zxoxm or is that not available? Is this IP blocked or not in this situation? Most of all please be clear with the reason why Zxoxm is being blocked so Zxoxm can respond accordingly and get back to editing Wikipedia with insightful information at least until the next censor attack if this current censor attack has not already doomed Zxoxm from doing so. Will Zxoxm ever be allowed to edit Wikipedia again?(Zxoxm (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)) Zxoxm (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No means no, Freedom5000. You abused a multitude of accounts as well as being patently disruptive. And when you create additional sock puppets, you then whine even more and play these stupid charades that you are playing now. You are not fooling any of us, and we are no longer going to entertain your unblock requests or any additional contact with you and Wikipedia until you learn how to grow up and learn to interact with others in a reasonable manner. Talk page editing privileges revoked. –MuZemike 23:31, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Only one unblock request at a time, please. Admins, see discussion at WP:ANI#could someone review this?. Sandstein 21:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)