User talk:Zugspitze2962

June 2016

Welcome!

Hello, Zugspitze2962, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎)

July 2016

Hello, I'm ProgrammingGeek. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Poland have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 20:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boyan Petrov on K2 in 2014

Hi! I'm not sure that Polish information about the serious altitude sickness of Boyan Petrov after K2 in 2014 is reliable. On August 1 he gave an interview for the Bulgarian website "Dnevnik", obviously in normal mental and health condition at that time. According to him, he had no health problems during the descent. Best Regards, Digital worm (talk) 18:41, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P. s. According to Boyan Petrov he had no altitude sickness, but a hypoglycemic crisis. In the Bulgarian media publications there is no information about altitude sickness and nearly fatal cerebral edema. Digital worm (talk) 07:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's right, Petrov is diabetic, what exactly it was now difficult to say. The fact, however, is that the Poles have found him unconscious in BC. As it was after the attack summit occurred suspicion of cerebral edema was due to loss of consciousness. He was administered medicament on both AMS and diabetes. Zugspitze2962 (talk) 10:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added a new paragraph on his accidents and health problems. Greetings, Digital worm (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring on Poland article

As a suggestion, don't get yourself blocked over this issue… I'm sure there are tons of Wrocław related articles that need a good clean up and image updates that someone needs to take on. --E-960 (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --E-960 (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3rr

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.— Preceding unsigned comment added by E-960 (talk • contribs)

October 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Poland. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Vanamonde (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Would you please stop edit-warring in Stepan Bandera, get yourself acquainted with our policies, starting with WP:RS, stop posting junk, and, if you still have some reason able information which should be in the article, start a discussion at the talk page. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zugspitze2962, you were blocked for edit-warring not very long ago, and here you are repeating the behavior. If you make further reverts without discussion, you re likely to receive an extended block, regardless of whether 3RR was violated. Vanamonde (talk) 08:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are already at three reverts anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm counting two reverts: unless the content in their first edit was previously in the article, and removed by somebody else? In any case, even if it were true, I intend my warning to extend beyond the 24 hours since their first edit. Vanamonde (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, the first edit was just POV pushing, not a revert.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Stepan Bandera for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Stepan Bandera, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Talk:Stepan Bandera. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Favonian (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

Since you have chosen to continue your edit-warring using several IP socks, I have made your block indefinite. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]