User talk:Zubeidaaslam786

Hello, please leave comments here.

Comment

Hello. I only mentioned that your comment, not yourself, was useless becuase it contributed nothing to the discussion. We usually need strong points in a debate, not stuff like yes he is right and no he is wrong. I sincerely apologize if I've offended you in any way. Thanks. Scieberking (talk) 08:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zubeidaas, let us ignore this one-off incident. Yes, BOI is perfectly reliable and only those who feel that BOI has "cheated" by reporting so-called reduced figures are saying otherwise. Scieberking has contradicted himself hugely, and he may get support from other like-minded editors. Its not unusual, and such tactics were used even in Ra.One to derail consensus and encourage trolling. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 10:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Bodyguard (2011 Hindi film). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. X.One ^SOS 10:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have personally attacked so many editors like Ashermadan, Meryam90 and AnikitBhatt. Please do not give me lecture. I have read all messages between you and the other biased individual. Stop this 2-faced charade. Zubeidaaslam786 (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 2

I'm sorry, were you referring to the SRK slaps Shirish Kunder discussion? ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 13:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he was very rude. Zubeidaaslam786 (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zubeidaaslam, let me tell you that if any editor is repeatedly asking you as to why you are voting against their opinion, and is trying to force your opinion in another direction, or if they are attempting to belittle it, stand firm and give them clear replies. They do not have the power to interrogate you over your opinion; you are required to give the reason only once. If you have done so, any further attempt at questioning is liable to be called arm-twisting and can be taken action against. Be firm against these editors (I'm sure you know who I'm talking about). ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 16:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]