User talk:Zuagery
 | This user got the Welcome to the Teahouse Badge. Earn one at: Teahouse Badges |
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Zuagery, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Zuagery! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Congrats Zuagery... You created your Teahouse profile!
[edit]
Nice to see you at the Teahouse! I hope you like to be here.
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. |
Carliitaeliza TALK 20:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
The Teahouse Turns One!
[edit]It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
|
Teahouse First Birthday Badge |
| Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Unblock me or not, it's up to you.
[edit]
Zuagery (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've been falsely Accused, and I can only accept it with sincerity. It's okay, even though I was on the block, I remain patient and sincere. you didn't know that the first person who started this edit warring is Stgw (talk), he's just good at reasoned, but behind it all, it was him who had made a big mistake.
Decline reason:
It doesn't matter who started it. You were edit warring; you've been blocked for doing this before, so you should have figured it out by now. The next time you're blocked for this will be much longer. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- In addition, what you're doing on Escape the Fate is also unhelpful and by now disruptive. This edit restores unreliably sourced information on trivial matters. Comments by the band's own members are usually irrelevant--this is an encyclopedia, and should cite only relevant and reliably sourced information. Same with that marketing campaign: why should our article repeat such minutiae? If no reliable sources comment on it, it's simply not important. This isn't a fan site. Besides, simply reverting, without commentary and without improving (in this case) the sourcing, that's just plain rude. Drmies (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- You have it wrong. Being blocked or unblocked is up to you. As mentioned above, WP:GAB is a good place to start if you want to be unblocked. It's clear you didn't read and/or understand that before your previous unblock request. Toddst1 (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- And I am trying to explain to you what you can do to improve your standing when you return. Todd is quite correct: it's up to you. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Removal of material
[edit]WP:BLANKING states that you may not remove "any other notice regarding an active sanction."
Comments from the blocking admin related to the block - including the block notice itself while the block is in effect fall under that restriction along with any discussion regarding possible unblocking. Please do not continue to remove such information from your talk page while the block is in place. If this continues, you will lose your ability to edit your talk page and your block may be extended. Toddst1 (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Issues (Escape the Fate song) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:ETF ungrateful single cover.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:ETF ungrateful single cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:ETF you're insane single cover.jpg.png)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:ETF you're insane single cover.jpg.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)