User talk:Zsoltszemerszky

Welcome!

Hello, Zsoltszemerszky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

License tagging for File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I uploaded a photo I made File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg and I would like to setup its right for free usage. Can you please tell me how can I do it? I used the following tag:

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Did I make it right?

Yes, I believe you did it mostly right, I've fixed the minor errors. Primefac (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU! I truly appreciate it.. Zsoltszemerszky (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finalising an article: Draft:Dodo_Newman

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I created an article as a Draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dodo_Newman Could you please help me to validate it and to move it to the Live articles? I also noticed that somehow I might not link properly the article together with the photo I uploaded to it: File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg THANK YOU for your kind assistance.

Hi Zsoltszemerszky, You've properly submitted the draft to be reviewed by experienced Wikipedia editors. I'd request you to wait for some considerable amount of time as the reviewing process does take some time, normally two-three weeks. However, at this time it may take even longer due to the process being backlogged since few months (around 2500 submissions awaiting to be reviewed). I've fixed the image in the draft. You may find 'Picture tutorial' helpful in any similar or further cases. Hope, it does help. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupmehra, thank you very much for your kind help with the image. I will look forward the approval of the article. Thanks again.

Unfortunately that draft is not ready to be accepted. Wikipedia content should be based on reliable sources that are independent of the subject, but discuss it in some detail. The only sources that so much as mention Newman are those in relation to her diamond-studded artwork, and few of those provide details about Newman herself. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source and should not be used as a reference; links to other Wikipedia articles are merely a convenience for our readers. See Help:Links on how to create such links. Huon (talk) 11:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Huon (talk). Thank you for your message. Regarding the biography of Dodo Newman there were two books published and both are linked to the page:

1., The Inspirationalist: The true life of Dodo Newman (ISBN-13: 978-1447866572 - November 29, 2011 - http://amzn.com/1447866576)

2., Out of the Box Innovation: (ISBN-13: 978-1300856085 - March 20, 2013 - http://amzn.com/1300856084)
Furthermore you can also read about her biography on Newman's official biography: https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/dodo-newman-inspirationaliste/id883112488 and/or http://issuu.com/dodonewman/docs/portfolio_2014
You can also find out more for the other project (Titanic project (http://www.titanic-project.com), Princess Charlene artwork) by simply Google them. I truly believe that I ensured the necessary reliable sources.
I hope the article will be accepted soon. With Kind regards, Zsolt 17:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Censoring: Draft:Dodo_Newman

You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

I created an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dodo_Newman It contained the following line: “In 24th August 2014, Dodo Newman gave birth to Faye Martha Novak, daughter of Alf-Peter Karl-Friedrich Schulz von Siemens." Yesterday I noticed that it was removed by the father of the child. However it is the profile of Ms Newman and she strongly asked to present that she is a mother of this child. How can I avoid that the father always remove this line? Should we upload the birth certificate as well? What could be the right way to create a TRUE biography without censoring by the father?

The information was removed, rightly, as it was unsourced. Until a reliable source covers this, per WP:BLP, it should not be restored. --Mdann52talk to me! 11:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mdann52talk to me! PROOF: Please find it here as the proof : http://dodonewman.com/media/faye-birth-certificate.jpg

You seem to be attempting to communicate directly with Mdann52. I've pinged them for you, {{Help me}} is for general requests, not requests of a specific user. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 15:29, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Mdann52talk to me! 11:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dodo Newman (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Mdann52talk to me! 11:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Zsoltszemerszky, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Mdann52talk to me! 11:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mdann52talk to me! Dear [User:Mdann52], could you please put back the article in order to make some correction in it? All the contents are the own property of Dodo Newman. The issue is her public portfolio as an artists. And the MonacoWealthManagement article was created from a public press release based on her work for Princess Charelene. These sites are only linkned as references. Please let me know how should I correct the article and I will do it.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Wikipedia-dodo-newman.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]