User talk:Zsinj/Archive 1

Welcome!

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: [[User:Yamamoto_Ichiro|Ichiro]] <small>([[User talk:Yamamoto Ichiro|会話]]|<span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Yamamoto_Ichiro&action=edit&section=new +]</span>|[[Special:Contributions/Yamamoto_Ichiro|投稿記録]]|[[Special:Emailuser/Yamamoto_Ichiro|メール]])</small> 05:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC).

Be bold!

youngamerican (talk)

paperwaving

please discuss why you feel paperwaving should be deleted.

I did not nominate that article for deletion, however you did delete it's tag and blank it's AFD page. I left you a message on your talk page. --Zsinj 18:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Vandals

Hey Zsinj, just wanted to drop a line & say you're doing a great job nailing those vandals! Mikkerpikker 13:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cumberland Valley High School

could you check out Cumberland Valley High School and revert to the changes i made. some clown added a bunch of crap to the page. i would appreciate it.Wrightchr

Thanks

I notice you reverted this edit very quickly (under a minute!). Thanks! --Mr. Billion 06:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

If you're talking about the DEFCON buissiness, OK... 68.39.174.238 23:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...

That template is highly confused and semicontradictory. 68.39.174.238 21:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh

Now that makes more sense. 68.39.174.238 21:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what is nonsense?

I thought this Wikipedia project was about open source - free speech Who nominated YOU to decide on what is nonsense or not? Why not rename the project Zsinj-pedia? I have heard about editors like you who just want to make the edit according to their own viewpoint rather than bring about a concensus. I happen to think my text was in context and informative and is more useful to people wanting to know the meaning of the term than some of the nonsense you have 'elected' to include on the page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.123.140.77 (talk • contribs) .

Karma in Hinduism

Thanks, Zsinj for reverting a vandalizer's edits. I spent a lot of time writing the article and citing sources. People often ask me how karma in Hinduism is different from Buddhism. That was a driving force for that article.

Raj2004 23:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC) No problem, Keep up the great work! This is supposed to be an encylopedia![reply]

Raj2004 00:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Here's wishing you a very happy 19th birthday! --Lightdarkness 18:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rv on my talk page?

Can you please explain why you reverted a comment left by another user on my talk page? I don't understand the reason or violation. thanks. Crunch 21:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I guess he was trying to make a case for the page we all voted to delete on the AfD. He's probably a newcomer who doesn't get how it works. I appreciate your diligence, and happy birthday! Crunch 23:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

subst

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

Thanks for helping patrol new articles! howch e ng {chat} 19:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RC patrol

Hi, What are the peak times (UTC)? I'd like to help, but want to work when the need is greatest.

Cheers, Mikereichold 21:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant linkspam

When you revert the type of spammer who replaces content with a huge list of their links, can you use {{bv}} instead of {{spam1}}. It really is blatant vandalism rather than link spamming and means that they can be blocked if they do it again. Good work on the vandal fighting btw. --GraemeL ^(talk) 18:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succesful RfA!

Thank you for your support during my RfA! The community has decided to make me an administrator, and there's work to be done. I look forward to seeing you around the project in the future, and if you see me do anything dumb, let me know right away! Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Just saying hi. --vex 22:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity

What was this (and this) for? ;) —Nightstallion (?) 02:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq invasion

Page is being broken up and cleaned up. Please don't mess with it or the created pages until they are done. Thanks. pookster11 03:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be entirely appropriate to post on the discussion page the issues you believe should be addresses in the Iraq Invasion article rather than unilaterally make wholesale changes to large parts of the article. Many people are working on this piece and trying to do so cooperatively. I'm sure you will find a willingness to work out the differences.Dawgknot 03:36, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, but you reverted when I was right in the middle of changing things around, I hadn't had a chance to summarize what I had done yet because... wel I was in the middle of doing it. Thanks anyway though. pookster11 06:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the message. I'm not leading the effort, but I am certainly in support of it. Dawgknot 15:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Many thanks for participating in my RfA. Although you voted oppose, I appreciate the kind comments you made and hope we'll be able to collaborate on something in the future. All the best, Jamyskis

Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 16:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]