User talk:Zrulli

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Zrulli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Underneath-it-All 23:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tags?

Is there a wiki page with a list of tags. i.e. like wikify, cleanup, etc. I wanted to place 1 or 2 of them but i can't seem to find the correct page. Thanks --Zrulli 04:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can start at Wikipedia:Template messages and go to the appropriate section/ subpages -- Lost^(talk) 04:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page was just vandalized by a person who edited an article i tagged for deletion. Admin Needed!

check my edit history for more info...

I restored the previous contents of the talk page. In addition, the article that you tagged has now been deleted. Sorry for the inconveniences. —W. Flake (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've warned the user. Xiner (talk, email) 03:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to tell you a bit about policy regarding vandalism (the full text is available at Wikipedia:Vandalism):

If someone vandalizes a page, they don't get immediately blocked (unless the vandalism is really, really bad, or if it's clear that a user account was set up only to vandalize articles). Instead, they are warned, and when they receive enough warnings, they are blocked. Some warning templates include {{test}}, {{spam4im}}, and {{bv}}.

In this case, however, there was a bot (User:VoABot II) that reverted the edit in question, and warned the user. A bot is software that is designed to edit Wikipedia based on its code; it's a normal editor, except that it's automated. See WP:BOT. Another bot that fights vandalism is User:AntiVandalBot.

If you see vandalism, you can revert it. See WP:REVERT for more information. If you need an admin to block someone for vandalizing repeatedly, report him or her at WP:AIV. Gracenotes ^T § 03:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

REVERSION

You reverted my edit, it is my page. I can do as I please. 22:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

You cannot remove warnings and continue to vandalize. Make an account if you want to make your own page. (Self Addition) --Zrulli 22:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{Helpme} User_talk:70.152.177.205. Look at the history of the page. --Zrulli 22:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the earlier warnings and notified the user with {{uw-tpv1}}. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 22:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked now for 31 hours by Luna Santin. --KFP (talk | contribs) 22:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mojibake/Bat Fuck Insane

I made Mojibake link to Bat Fuck Insane.
I think people who look up Mojibake should get a proper look at it, on an actual page, not just a screenshot. It wasn't meant in a vandalism sense. ShandraShazam 02:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree - Mojibake would best be demonstrated with an image of it, not a nonsense Wikipedia article. "Bat Fuck Insane" should be deleted Reswobslc 03:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Proof Approval

I am letting you know that the reason your name has been removed from the User:AmiDaniel/VP/Approval list is because u have less than 250 edits on the mainspace of wikipedia. If you disagree with your edit count being less than 250 let me know but until you get more experience under your belt please wait to be approved.--Joebengo 02:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Dude (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

Says on your profiley thing that you wanna be an admin. Well, even though you're younger than me and American, if I knew how to vote or nominate you, I would. Michaelritchie200 10:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, how can you be glad that Pluto is no longer a planet!? Michaelritchie200 10:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please read the discussion page on the nobel award given to Al Gore. Dirac66 cites the nobel association justifying al gore's win. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forcefieldmaker87 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image question

Hi Zrulli, did you get this image from NASA Spaceflight.com's L2 Forums? The image says it was obtained from Marshall Spaceflight Center, but that is not the type of image that NASA releases to the public, so I'm wondering if you can give me the URL where you got it from, so the source information can be specified. Thanks, Ariel♥Gold 17:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I got this image from the return to flight page where the ECO problem was found. [1]--zrulli 17:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, awesome, I'll add the source info to the commons page, otherwise the image would have been deleted. That's kind of surprising, usually NASA does not release those "rough graphics" to the public, lol. Good find on that! Ariel♥Gold 17:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beat you to it! --zrulli 17:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hee hee, fixed it up a bit. Hope you don't mind! Ariel♥Gold 17:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! --zrulli 18:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

helpme

{{helpme}} I was wondering the correct licence for an image [2] I uploaded. Thanks!

I've added a generic license. Addhoc (talk) 00:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shuttle Endeavour

I think you've confused Endeavour with Atlantis. Atlantis doesn't have a scheduled mission after STS-125, as you've added to the infobox on Endeavour, which could be the last shuttle to fly. -MBK₀₀₄ 22:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, they should have made the names differently. You can revert my edit. I should review the info box formatting before i edit anyways. Sorry! --zrulli 22:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

You might want to doublecheck this revert, since the text refers to coprolalia. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really did not think it was necessary for the article to include the words that were used while that character was ticking. --zrulli 19:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the edit came from a school where vandalism has occurred over the past few weeks. --zrulli 19:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just wanted you to be aware to take care labeling edits associated with coprolalia as vandalims, just in case. I didn't see that episode, so I can't say if that text was accurate; I would have added a cite needed tag, and come back to it to revert in a few days if no citation was supplied. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I just have this article flagged in my mind with vandalism as I have tourettes syndrome and I ran across it on the RC page. The information was correct, but the source of the information and how little it contributed to the article made me revert it. : ) --zrulli 19:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Third Eye Blind A Collection.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Third Eye Blind A Collection.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dogulas McArthur West Point.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dogulas McArthur West Point.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1994

Hi Zrulli. I appreciate the effort at One Nine Nine Four, but we had problems with this article in the past, as you can see on the article talk page. What came out of the last thing was given the film is still fairly off the radar, with few places to source and cite quality information, a concise article was absolutely sufficient. As and when more about the movie can be sourced - independent reviews, impact on culture etc - a longer article may be necessary. An external link to the website is provided, but data copied directly from their website is not considered "reliable", and does not confer notability for all those on cast and crew lists. Interested parties can click through if they want to see the website. Cheers, Deiz talk 02:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I totally see your point about notability for the individuals but I'm not sure how its not reliable but we should definitely see how it goes. I'm not sure how bit this film will actually get but waiting may be the best bet, reading the discussion on the talk. --zrulli 02:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet as.. as far as sourcing goes, it's cool to have an external link to the article subject's page, but per WP:RS there are problems with using their own site for independent, reliable information. Let's see how the movie turns out... Deiz talk 19:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third Eye Blind

Hi! I'm glad you liked my picture from the concert! It was definitely hard to get a good shot in there :-) bdesham ★ 01:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

... my update at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Abuse_reports/38.116.200.64 Cheers,LeadSongDog come howl 20:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NewClassGenesis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewClassGenesis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minitorvpager.JPG

What kind of camera did you take this with? Daniel Christensen (talk) 06:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dogulas McArthur West Point.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dogulas McArthur West Point.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 23:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dwight Eisenhower West Point.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dwight Eisenhower West Point.JPG.