User talk:Zrs 12

The code for not equal is $\neq$

{{helpme}} How and where would I get templates to put on my account pages?

There are many forms of templates. You can explore a vast number of them at Wikipedia:Template messages. However, based on the context of your question, I suspect you are looking for userboxes. Please see Wikipedia:Userboxes.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question in Wikipedia:Consultas

About your question: you don't find the page La Ultra Morada because it has been erased by violation of copyright. Best regards, Mercedes 19:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Physics major and careers

I chose to answer on your talk page because my answer is likely to be rather long and not exactly pertinent to the question you asked on the reference desk. I myself am a sophomore at Duke University majoring in biophysics with plans to go onto graduate school, so maybe I can give you a heads up to some of the important questions to keep in mind whether you chose to be a physics major/grad student or not. Anyway, I scoped out your user boxes and I am going to assume that the information is current which makes you a 9th grader. It's good to start thinking about these sorts of things early, but before you pick out your ideal job you want to apply for in 11+ years, it is probably more important to figure out what kind of undergraduate college is right for you. Two things to think about...

What are your academic interests? Are you mostly interested in sciences only or are your interests more general? If you are primarily interested in the sciences, then you will want to make sure you consider tech and engineering schools. If your interests are more ranged then consider a liberal arts school which will allow you to take a variety of science and non-science classes. (Duke has both a liberal arts and an engineering program) You want to make sure that the college you go to can span your interests.
How dead set are you on physics? Have you taken a physics class yet? Did you decide this recently or has physics been your "gut instinct" for a while? Obviously if you think you could change your mind that will affect college choice. I thought I read somewhere that most people going to college aren't sure of what they are going to major in, so you don't have to have everything completely planned out yet.

I am going to have to cut myself short to keep myself from rambling, but if you have more questions, you can either ask me or post to the ref desk. Sifaka ^talk 21:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me?

Don't revert without explanation unless it's a clear case of vandalism. Thank you. -/- Warren 19:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join WikiProject Genetics

Hi, Zrs 12. You are cordially invited to join the Genetics WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to genetics. We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort.

We look forward to working with you in the project! – Liveste (talk • edits) 13:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics.

Question to keep from Math refdesk

What is the name of this equation and what is it's significance? What does it mean? $\langle \Omega |{\mathcal {T}}\{{\hat {\phi }}(x_{1})\cdots {\hat {\phi }}(x_{n})\}|\Omega \rangle ={\frac {\int {\mathcal {D}}\phi \phi (x_{1})\cdots \phi (x_{n})e^{i\int d^{4}x\left({1 \over 2}\partial ^{\mu }\phi \partial _{\mu }\phi -{m^{2} \over 2}\phi ^{2}-{\lambda \over 4!}\phi ^{4}\right)}}{\int {\mathcal {D}}\phi e^{i\int d^{4}x\left({1 \over 2}\partial ^{\mu }\phi \partial _{\mu }\phi -{m^{2} \over 2}\phi ^{2}-{\lambda \over 4!}\phi ^{4}\right)}}}$ Ζρς ι'β' ^¡hábleme! 05:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it means, "I really wanted to show off when I was writing this equation". Or maybe, "Nah, nah, my brain is bigger than yours!" « Aaron Rotenberg « Talk « 06:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy shit, is that an integral inside an exponent inside an integral???? Someguy1221 (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this actually belongs in the physics desk. This looks more like something a physicist would write. More precisely, it looks like statistical physics / quantum statistical physics / conformal field theory. I would not assume that this is necessarily show off. Oded (talk) 09:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looks like physics to me. I think some context would be useful - where did you find the equation? --Tango (talk) 14:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found it on Uncyclopedia and YouTube; however, it has been verified as a legitimate equation on the Science refdesk. Note: I didn't cross-post this so you don't have to tell me not to. ~~I don't know who did though.~~ Wisdom 89 did. Ζρς ι'β' ^¡hábleme! 19:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've seen this before in a book about prime numbers. I think it's something to do with Srinivasa Ramanujan; although I'm most probably wrong... Jonny23415552 (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guessing: The left hand side is a Dirac bracket of quantum mechanics. Ω is a state vector and T is an operator. The right hand side includes covariant tensor derivations of a potential Φ. The denominator is a normalization constant that makes the fraction a probability. The integration inside the exponent is over a four-dimensional volume. The m is a mass and the λ is the cosmological constant. The value of this integral is a phase. The Planck constant does not enter explicitely into the equation, so the units chosen make the Planck constant equal to unity. So this may be an equation attempting to express quantum gravity. I am merely guessing. Bo Jacoby (talk) 21:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

'OPERATOR'

What does this operator mean (the "\bigoplus" one)? $V=\bigoplus _{n=0}^{\infty }V_{n}$ --Ζρς ι'β' ^¡hábleme! 19:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Direct sum. --Tango (talk) 19:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) The "\bigoplus" is just a big version of "\oplus"; it can be used to depict iterated application of the operator, like the sigma is used for summation. Your formula

\bigoplus _{n=0}^{\infty }V_{n}

is thus equivalent to

V_{0}\oplus V_{1}\oplus V_{2}\oplus \cdots

, as you probably know.

The interpretation of

\oplus

itself depends on context; I've seen it used for the XOR operation and for the intersection of constraints in constraint satisfaction literature (the latter is thus identical to the intersection operator

\cap

). Oliphaunt (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With the Vs, though, it's extremely likely to be the direct sum of vector spaces. Algebraist 23:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Category Addition

Why did you ad Category:lakota to a mass of pages many of which such as Black Hills Central Railroad have nothing to do with it? Spiesr (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blueberry Yum Yum (song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blueberry Yum Yum (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RayAYang (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Blueberry yum yum (plant)

A tag has been placed on Blueberry yum yum (plant), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BustOut' (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Redirect makes more sense. I probably hit the speedy delete a bit too fast though but if you can include it in the main article then it may be better. --BustOut' (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Blueberry Yum Yum (song)

I have nominated Blueberry Yum Yum (song), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blueberry Yum Yum (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ray Yang (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Main page redesign

Hello, Zrs 12! Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal was recently cleared of all design entries. You may want to re-enter your design(s), based on the details here. (You can see the old list of designs here). NOTE: A survey was conducted on what users wanted to see in the new main page, you can see the results here. Nick Penguin_(contribs) 02:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blueberry yum yum

The truth is until you left me the message I had never heard of Blueberry yum yum. As a general thing though don't use Wikipeida, WikiAnswers and YouTube as sources. None of them are relilable, plus linking to YouTube may violate the copyright of the song. It's very hard to find sources for notability of modern songs, unless people are offended by it. Which in this case is not very likely. Sorry I can't help more. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 10:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, your bank-robbery note definitely says "I've got a GUB"!

If the [history of] Grand_Unified_Bootloader isn't self-explantory, you're welcome to question me. It seems clear your intentions are good (excuse me for not taking the time to know enough to appreciate you more substantively!), so thanks for your willingness to edit.
--Jerzy•t 00:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Straw poll

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll in selecting five proposals before an RFC in which it will be against the current main page. You're input would be appreciated. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Very thoughtful of you to answer my ref desk query on my talk page - much appreciated! Adambrowne666 (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC) - and I've succesfully changed the screen resolution, so thanks again...[reply]

UBX edited

I made a minor edit to your userspace at User:Zrs 12/userbox/pi - hope you don't mind. PirateSmackK (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Lakota

Category:Lakota, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wasi'chu Jaque Hammer (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lakota Incubator

If you’re still interested in developing the Lakota Wikipedia at Incubator. I tried to make a layout for the main page here (mainly copied from Yucatec Maya). My Lakota is very basic, so the texts needs some revising as well. --Lundgren8 (t · c) 23:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I chose to move ”my” design to the main page. If you want to change something, feel free. :) --Lundgren8 (t · c) 13:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then I say welcome back and I hope you find something to contribute. :) --Lundgren8 (t · c) 18:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]