User talk:Zqzkqzq

Welcome!

Hello, Zqzkqzq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 12:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zqzkqzq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not made any disruptive edits. I was maliciously and falsely accused of vandalism. I cannot believe that you have blocked me for nothing more than being annoyed by this false and malicious accusation. Zqzkqzq (talk) 12:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism. You are blocked for making disruptive and unfounded accusations against other users and for edit warring. You have used this unblock request to carry on the same behavior. Please use the time this block has afforded you to read our assume good faith and edit warring policies. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zqzkqzq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I was not blocked for vandalism. I have not made any disruptive or unfounded accusations against other users. I was the victim of an unfounded and disruptive accusation, not merely of vandalism but of being a *vandalism-only account*. That accusation was blatantly malicious in intent. I cannot believe that you have blocked me over this. The user who maliciously accused me must be *thrilled* by how this panned out.

Decline reason:

Since you don't think you did anything improper, there are no grounds to remove the block. See WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zqzkqzq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not do anything improper. Not even remotely. I did not make any disruptive or unfounded accusations. I did not make any edits that were anything other than productive. I was falsely and maliciously accused of vandalism. If you cannot see that accusing someone falsely of operating a "vandalism only account" is malicious, then you are stunningly clueless. If you think being malicious is fine but calling someone malicious is somehow outrageous, then you are stunningly clueless. The single-purpose "revert-and-template" account that maliciously and falsely accused me must be *thrilled* at how their malice played out.

Decline reason:

Now indefinitely blocked as a confirmed sock. Bbb23 (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Black Kite says "The edit-warring and accusations of malice are completely uncalled for" - I was accused of being a *vandalism-only account*. How is it possibly "uncalled for" to call that malicious? It was a blatantly malicious act. The person who did that must be *loving* how it played out. Zqzkqzq (talk) 12:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]