User talk:Zorxd
Welcome Zorxd
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Zorxd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 22:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
3RR
[edit]Just a friendly reminder that if you make one more revert at Monarchy in Quebec, you'll be in breach of WP:3RR. Please try to leave long-standing (i.e. more than a month) material be and seek consensus through discussion for your proposed changes. Cheers. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 23:27, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- The first one was technically an edit since I added a lot more info. You, however, did revert 3 times. --zorxd (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Here is what happened : First version (which stayed for a month) :
- Support for the monarchy is usually low in Quebec in recent history : a july 2009 opinion poll suggested that a strong majority of the population favoured the monarchy's elemination.
Today, you change it to :
- A June 2009 opinion poll found that 86% of respondents in Quebec held the opinion that at the end of the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, Canada should "cut its connection to the monarchy."
I edit it to add more information to explain the conclusion made in my first version, thinking that it would satisfy the reason of your modification while not denaturing the idea.
- Support for the monarchy is far from being unanimous in Quebec in recent history : a july 2009 opinion poll suggested that a strong majority of the population favoured the monarchy's elemination[1][2], the opposition has been decribed as "nearly unanimous"[3] and it is considered the only province with a strong support for a republic[4].
You revert to your version.
Instead of reverting to my last version, I put back the original one, as I thought that we should put it back while we discuss the issue.
And now you revert again.
I revert.
You revert for the 3rd time and call 3RR against me. --zorxd (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- No, I warned you to be careful to not break the three revert limit. In 24 hrs you're permitted three reverts, not four. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 00:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- No problem then. --zorxd (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://www.ottawacitizen.com/story_print.html?id=2199184&sponsor=
- ^ Attitudes about Canada (PDF), Toronto: The Strategic Counsel, 26 June 2009, p. 26, retrieved 1 April 2010
- ^ http://www.uni.ca/modernisation_canadien.html
- ^ http://www.canadian-politics.com/tiki-index.php?page=Debate+on+the+Monarchy
You're invited!
[edit]Hello, Zorxd,
You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.
The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!
(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Reference details and use of repeat references
[edit]Note: for this revision, you should fill out the entire reference details using an appropriate template from the drop-down pick list, and then assign a ref name for repeat use of that same ref; see WP:REFNAME. Zefr (talk) 16:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
New section at COVID-19 vaccination in Canada
[edit]I've added a new section on pharmacological developments on the vaccines as they've become known (including second dose administration) onto the COVID-19 vaccination in Canada page if you had anything to add. CaffeinAddict (talk) 16:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)