User talk:Zorro2001

Welcome!

Hello, Zorro2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Grand master ka 18:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Water fluoridation controversy

About your addition to the article... I can see what you're trying to do with this, but I reverted it because your addition has a soapbox-like quality to it (Wikipedia is not a soapbox) among other issues. If you would like to rewrite it to be more encyclopedic in tone (and better researched) I'm willing to help. Grand master ka 18:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't see how you interpret my comments as "soapbox-like". Please give examples. However, in the past two years, this site has expanded expontentially and I'm glad to see the amount of material added to it.

Zorro2001 (talk) 23:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pearl Cornioley.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Zorro2001!
We thank you for uploading Image:Pearl Cornioley.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Multiple sources call it a literary forgery.[1] - you even changed sourced text where the source calls it a forgery. You also broke the link to Literary forgery. If you want to make such a major change you need to show on the talk page that reliable sources don't call it that. Doug Weller talk 19:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]