User talk:Zoranzdr

Welcome

Hello, Zoranzdr, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Zoran Zdravkovski

Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia

Babel user information

mk-N	Овој корисник зборува македонски како мајчин јазик.

en-4	This user has near native speaker knowledge of English.

fr-1	Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.

hr-1	Ovaj suradnik ima osnovno znanje hrvatskog jezika.

sr-1	Овај корисник има основно знање српског језика.

bg-1	Този потребител има основни познания по български език.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zoranzdr/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Zoranzdr/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zoranzdr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, had difficulty understanding how to submit my contribution from my sandbox for review. I think I now solved the problem. Thank you. Zoranzdr (talk) 08:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petar Zdravkovski (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just 1 source and it reads like an ad.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petar Zdravkovski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Petar Zdravkovski, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 09:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zoranzdr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 09:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petar Zdravkovski has been accepted

Petar Zdravkovski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mole not yet updated

Regarding your recent edits at Mole (unit) (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mole_(unit)&diff=841966660&oldid=841283893), as far as I can tell, it's still only a *proposed* change in definition. The link in the first paragraph of the lede (https://doi.org/10.1515%2Fci-2018-0220) isn't an announcement of official completion of the change, it's only an announcement of the proposed change. It labels itself as a recommendation, and explicitly states "In November 2018, revised definitions of the ... mole are expected to be approved by the CGPM" (implying it hasn't yet been approved) and "The revised definitions are expected to come into force on World Metrology Day, 20 May 2019." Additionally, the IUPAC GoldBook still lists the old Carbon-12 version as the definition. -- 160.129.138.186 (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 10:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:MJCCE 41 1 2022 full.png

Thanks for uploading File:MJCCE 41 1 2022 full.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering has been accepted

Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society of Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Society of Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zoranzdr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 08:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought I was working in the draft space, I didn't plan to submit it yet. Guess I pressed the wrong button. Zoranzdr (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Society of Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia

Hello, Zoranzdr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Society of Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Svetlana Mojsov

Hi Zoranzdr, I would like to write an article about Svetlana Mojsov in German and currently I'm gathering information about her and her story. I see that you corrected her place of birth to Skopje and that in the Macedonian WP you also included information about her father. Unfortunately I could not identify on which sources this information is based. I'm sure that you have the respective sources and would therefore appreciate if you could either forward it/them to me or add them to the article. Alternatively, adding the sources to Wikidata would also be a good option. I'm looking forward to your help! Best wishes Barbasca (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barbasca,

Thank you for contacting me and so glad you plan on writing an article on Svetlana Mojsov in German. She sooo much deserves it.

The corrections and additions I made are based on personal info. Our parents go way back since WW2. Additionally, as a chemist (you can find my e-address at https://sctm.mk/bodies.htm) I have colleagues who have been in contact with Svetlana since their undergraduate studies in Belgrade.

I’m traveling until Monday and have only occasional internet access but I would be happy to answer any other questions.

Best, Zoran Zoranzdr (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Zoran,

Thank you for your quick answer. I will send you am email probably within the next days. Looking forward to following up with you. Barbasca (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]