User talk:Zoporific

Rosage

Danksank44: What is wrong with Brandon Rosage's page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danksank44 (talk • contribs)

See Talk:Brandon Rosage. Zoporific 22:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Hi Zoporific, thanks for creating all those subcategories of Category:Seventh-day Adventists for Adventists by nationality. Good stuff. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed most other religions were organized like that, by nationality, so I thought I could do the same for the SDAs. Zoporific 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

You nominated the Category:The Nakba for deletion here. As you participated in the proposed renaming vote for the article Talk:1948 Palestinian exodus which is still ongoing and in which editors have provided evidence of the more common usage of "Nakba" over "1948 Palestinian exodus", I have to ask you why you would initiate such a move at this time. Are you unfamiliar with WP:NAMING conventions which state that the most common name should be used for an article title? Do you have any evidence that "1948 Palestinian exodus" is more widely used than Nakba? If you do, can you please post it at the associated discussion on the article talk page? Thanks. Tiamut^talk 16:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it before I saw the move proposal. Yes, I am familiar with the policy. In any case, the category name should generally conform to the name of the main article. When (if?) the main article name changes, then so too can a rename for the category be proposed to reflect that. That's how things work, isn't it? Zoporific 19:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal - Angel Moroni

Please weigh in on the merger proposal between Angel Moroni and Moroni (prophet). You are receiving this notice since you were identified as a recent editor on one of those pages. Thanks! --Descartes1979 (talk) 07:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I'm not sure about that. It should be OK. I'll think about it before voting. Zoporific 21:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Snocrates for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. barneca (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just heard from Snocrates about this. It looks like I have caused her some problems. I thought it would be better for me to have my own user account ..... if others think she has been telling me what to edit she hasn't but she oriented me to wikipedia and how to use it, etc. Zoporific 23:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts, as confirmed by checkuser here. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Unblocked, and Warning

For the purposes of Wikipedia, you and your roommate User:Snocrates can be considered a single user, per the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Snocrates. Please be careful not to participate in the same discussions, WP:RFAs, WP:AFDs, and so on, without disclosing the connection or else you may be subject to remedies for violating WP:SOCK. If you both join together in editing an article, you may be treated as a single account for the purposes of WP:3RR and other policies and guidelines. Jehochman ^Talk 15:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes

You had participated back in February in this CfD regarding the Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes, which ended in no consensus. A new proposal has been made to eliminate this category and merge its contents to Category:War documentaries which is now going on at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 September 24#Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes. You are encouraged to reconsider the original CfD, revisit your opinion in that discussion and participate again in this latest CfD. Alansohn (talk) 20:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing?

Hi; do you still edit on Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia projects? Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abrahamhcannon.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abrahamhcannon.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

FYI: I was able to located a Public Domain image of Abraham H. Cannon.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:23, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anthonhlund.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anthonhlund.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

I have created derivative work of using File:First Presidency 1905 large.jpg (showing only Anthon H. Lund) thereby replacing this fair use image. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 14:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Josephfsmith.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, Josephfsmith.gif, has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 21:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC) ----ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 21:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Richardlevans.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Richardlevans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Georgefrichards.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Georgefrichards.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 14:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Dominican Republic Jehovah's Witnesses

Category:Dominican Republic Jehovah's Witnesses, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jeffro77 (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GeorgeQMorris.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GeorgeQMorris.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Category:Presidents of Biafra

Category:Presidents of Biafra, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jamie Tubers (talk) 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biafra Template you Created

Hello. Thanks for your edits on Wikipedia. Please could you try to fix these 2 articles I created (2014 Enugu Government House attack and 2014 Enugu State Broadcasting Service attack) into the Biafra template? The articles are kind-of too isolated from Biafra related topics. ~~Nigerians need to know what might be coming in 2015~~. Thanks. Darreg (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian Seventh-day Adventists

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian Seventh-day Adventists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Norwegian Jehovah's Witnesses

A tag has been placed on Category:Norwegian Jehovah's Witnesses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]