User talk:Zollerriia

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Zollerriia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 03:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Special Program in the Arts

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Special Program in the Arts, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: S.P.A.. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Special Program in the Arts a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trailing Slash on Root URLs

Go your address bar and type "google.com". Observe what happens when you hit enter. Then tell me, please, why you felt the need to edit out the trailing slashes in links at the Opera 10 article. These slashes may not be necessary (as it's the root), but they do belong. Apart from being unproductive, your edit sort of scares me. (Why did you bother? What made you even notice??) I don't see any merit per se in reverting your edit, but I'm quite curious. Was this just a matter of style or did you have some productive reason? (Incidentally, if it is a matter of style, I prefer the trailing slash ;))

WOFall (talk) 17:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redirects

when an article is moved, the original title, right or wrong, must be kept, in order to preserve the edit history. If very wrong, it could be directed to a better title, which in turn can be redirected to the moved article, but this is not usually worth the effort. DGG ( talk ) 16:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(again re:redirect, referring to Wikang_tagalog and others)

Hi Zollerria, please do not remove the article content when suggesting speedy deletion, even if it is only a redirect. Instead, add the CSD tag to the top of the page. Also please try to find the criterion under which you wish pages to be speedily deleted; this makes work for administrators easier. The {{Speedydelete}} template I believe is outdated, better use {{db}} with the specific reason, e.g. {{db-r3}} for an implausible redirect.

I took the freedom to decline the speedy deletion request Wikang tagalog and Tagalog (language).--Pgallert (talk) 09:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please move articles by using the "move page" function or Wikipedia:Requested moves, not by copying and pasting content. Thank you. cab (talk) 04:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIR - a consensus position?

Would you be able to support the position offered by Dcoetzee about midway down Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Summary

think there's room for a compromise here. It's clear that details such as particular channel numbers and the day-to-day schedule are largely useless to most people, but the list of channels served by a provider is quite relevant and relatively stable. To those who wish to redirect readers to the provider's web site: remember that Wikipedia is not just a website - articles about these providers may end up in printed books far away from an Internet terminal. Dcoetzee 00:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Because I think we are working towards that as a consensus point. Active Banana (talk) 04:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to British Columbia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mkdw ^talk 14:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vancouver. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mkdw ^talk 14:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Please do not continually nominate redirects for speedy deletion again after they have been declined. You will need to take these redirects to Redirects for Discussion if you wish to see these pages deleted. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing talk archives

Please do not edit the talk page discussion of other users, even for legitimate spelling corrections, without thier permission (See WP:TPNO and WP:TPO). Also, please do not edit talk archives, even for the same reason (WP:ARCHIVE). bahamut0013^words _deeds 13:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality vs. ethnicity in the Women in the Philippines article

I've followed up your edit here with this one. I didn't see the focus on ethnicity vs. nationality which apparently concerned you but, hopefully, the article is more neutral in that regard after my edit. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing user talk archives

Please do not edit other people's comments on talk pages - particularly a discussion in which you were not involved that is now on a year-old archive. I notice you have already been told about this kind of thing just a few months ago. Astronaut (talk) 10:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bold PHSA

Why are you bolding it? [1] and [2]. Moray An Par (talk) 04:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Trees for the Future

Hey Zollerriia,

Trees for the Future saw your contribution to the Agroforestry wiki article. We are really interested in getting a dialogue going with those who care about agroforestry and other environmental issues, and we wanted to know if you are on twitter? Feel free to get back to us on our talk page or contact us via email or twitter. Thanks and see you on the web! @Treesftf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treesftf (talk • contribs) 19:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

redirects

It is WP policy to redirect from all likely alternative capitalizations of multi-word phrases. Quite apart from that, trying to delete possibly unneeded but harmless redirects is not really productive; it takes much more in the way of both human and computer resources to remove them than to let them be. Even if you are concerned about disk space, which you need not be because it is exceedingly cheap, removing a page does not release disk space, because all old versions are always saved: a deletion just marks them as invisible.

If you would like to work on redirects, which the previous messages seem to indicate, what is needed most is the addition of missing ones: find an article with a possibly ambiguous title, click on "what links here", and see if there are any plausible alternatives not included, and make them. DGG ( talk ) 18:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removing extra spaces

I'm a little puzzled why you bothered with this edit. All it did was remove a few spaces, but also created a lengthy difference listing that takes a long time to look over. Astronaut (talk) 16:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Your Edits to Calbayog, et al.

Hello! Thanks for your edits to Calbayog. However, I have had to revert these as they are unverifiable, and marked as a minor edit when it was not such. Do you have sources that support your removal of all instances of the Tagalog language in this article? Please get back to me on my talk page in that case. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, in addition, you seem have to made the same sort of edit to Biliran, which I have also reverted. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same has been done to Cebu, Samar, and Bohol. Even if the Tagalog language is not native to those islands/provinces, it is still widely used there, especially in official capacities, as the national language Filipino. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use of (M) and edit summery.

Hello! I would like to ask that you review Help:Minor edit. It appears that you have checked the minor edit box on a number of edits for which you have added new content. In general, when you add new content, don't check the minor box. In addition, it would be helpful if you could be a little clearer on your edit summaries, by saying what you are actually changing. Only saying that you are making a small change isn't very helpful. Thank you for your contributions. Grayfell (talk) 22:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are still doing. Please stop. Novaseminary (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Filipino American, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". The changes to the article have been reverted per WP:BRD, furthermore there was not edit summary provided to explain the changes to the article, which did not appear to be minor. If it is the view of this editor that the changes were appropriate, please begin a discussion at the article's talk page and reach a consensus before making additional bold edits to the article. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor

Changing an organizations name and changing a reference cited are not minor edits. You have been asked many times to stop tagging non-minor edits as minor. Are you trying to annoy other editors? Please read WP:MINOR, if you have not already. And please follow it and stop tagging non-minor edits as minor. Thank you. Novaseminary (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incident

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Zollerriia. Thank you. --71.199.125.210 (talk) 04:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Department of Education (Philippines) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The '''Department of Education''', abbreviated as '''DepEd''' or '''KEd''') is the [[Executive Departments of the Philippines|executive department]] of the [[Government of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of gifted and talented programmes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philippine Science High School and Regional Science High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acronyms in the Philippines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philippine Science High School and Regional Science High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zollerriia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zollerriia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zollerriia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]