User talk:Zoffioindia

Welcome!

Hello, Zoffioindia, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Abhishek Kamani, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhishek Kamani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abhishek Kamani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 14:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zoffioindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Rama3035 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

As per User Policy, you can't use any Company name as a user so I changed and as per Wikipedia Policy, so request to unblock my account

Decline reason:

No answer to questions in over 3 days. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A word of caution: This user still represented them as "we" and is focused in editing the article on COI. (from #wikipedia-en-help) Regards—☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a subject that you are trying to create an article about, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to break the 3 important questions above.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zoffioindia: Are you interested in helping to build the encyclopedia without adding any content related to you or your organization? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry

Zoffioindia did not respond because he continued to work on the drafts using two new accounts and IPs. I've just blocked Rama2151 and Rama2050 for sock puppetry. Consider deleting Draft:Abhishek Kamani and Draft:Zoffio for good measure. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zoffioindia: Understand that you are blocked, not just this account. You are not permitted to simply go around the block by making and operating new accounts. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

I've removed the deletion templates. User talk pages cannot be deleted normally. While you're here, please answer this question:

Are some or all of the IPs you? Are you still working on Draft:Zoffio using IPs?

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zoffioindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Your proposed new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I need to post about another firm

Decline reason:

You have not addressed any of the concerns. You have created and used two other accounts. You have been unresponsive to questions. You appear to even be continuing to edit the draft using IPs. Now you wish to be unblocked to work on another article. You have to start discussing things if you want that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what is in the blue box above and please read the section above that entitled "Please read". Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zoffioindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Zoffioindia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. Request to change my user name to chandra2111

Decline reason:

There is a long list of problems here, and you have not addressed any of them. Kuru (talk) 11:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to give an opinion but will leave it to others to decide on the fate of this user.

I think this user should not be unblocked. He almost certainly has a conflict of interest. He evaded his block by creating and abusing several accounts. He has also blatantly lied about it.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Zoffio

Draft:Zoffio, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Zoffio and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Zoffio during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Eat me, I'm a red bean (talk · contribs) 11:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zoffioindia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Your proposed new username : ecomindia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

please unblock me and ready to follow all guidelines

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked due to repeated refusal to address your problematic editing. Empty promises are not good enough. MER-C 18:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has many concerns that may result in declining the unblock request. But before any of those are addressed, are you really sure that you read all of User talk:Banga1984? I want you to be well aware of the possibility that a Zoffio article may contain content that may be damaging to your company. You would have absolutely no control over removing that content or deleting the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]