User talk:Zoechristmas
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tanya "Sweet Tee" Winley.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 13:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tanya "Sweet Tee" Winley.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tanya "Sweet Tee" Winley
[edit]Dear Zoechristmas: I have been reviewing your article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tanya "Sweet Tee" Winley. I believe that the sources are adequate, but there is one more problem with the article before it can be published. It contains some sentences that are opinions and speculation, and while these make the article interesting, they are not appropriate for an encyclopedia, which just contains dry facts. There are two things that can be done: (1) I can decline the article, and you can remove some sections, and reword others ( for example, in an encyclopedia you can't say "Freddy the Rapper's work is a lot like Joe HopHip's", but you could say, if you can back it up, "In his book Wonderful Street Music, Johnny Writer writes about the similarity of Freddy the Rapper's work to Joe HopHip's" ) and then you can resubmit, or (2) You can let me remove the offending sections, accept the article, and continue to improve it afterward by finding sources to back up anything you want to put back. Let me know which you would prefer. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Anne:
I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm not sure if this is the proper way to respond to your message. Thank you so much for reading and replying to my article. I understand the problems you pointed out, and I would like to go with the second option – to delete certain sentences, and to go ahead and publish it. I will be tweaking it as I learn more, anyways. Thanks again for your help!
Best, Zoe
19:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Dear Zoe: Okay, I will do it. Please remember to sign your posts by typing for tildas (~) in a romw. Then the system will automatically put your user name, talk page, date and time. Here, I'm doing it now... —Anne Delong (talk) 20:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Anne! I appreciate your facilitation. Zoechristmas (talk) 00:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
—Anne Delong (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC)