User talk:Zmmz

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is Zmmz). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

• Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
• Please use a neutral point of view to edit the article; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do that.
• Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted texts, advertisement messages, and texts that are not related to that article. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism. A user who repeatedly vandalises articles will be blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

from Wikipedian: Kukini 05:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I've reported your violation of 3RR on the administrator's noticeboard. siafu 02:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

I didn`t know what the 3rr was, but OK.Zmmz 04:51, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Persians

Please get on Talk:Persian_people, Aucaman is trying to bully his POV again.

Your comments would be appreciated

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Aucaman_and_User:Heja_helweda_and_User:Diyako

Please take a look

[1]

Kurd nationalists..

DO you know anything about Azarbaijan?

The page had a lot of pan-Turkist POV and misinformation. Firstly they claim the term Azari is not used when in Iran Azaris use an a instead of the e They say in Iran it is Azeri. 72.57.230.179

User Grandmaster is Threatening me on account of my user box

I designed a user box for the Azari wiki which I am a member of saying I beleive in the unification of Iran and the Republic of Azarbaiajn he dletes it and calls it vanadlaism and threatens me. It is funny how he places one saying he bleives in the liberatoon of Suthern Azarbiajn but when other Azaris like myslef place our boxs it is vandalism and contraversal. This is about freedom of expression and he does not even allow desending views. I want Admin involvment with his biased propganda. 72.57.230.179

Your work on Nizami was Great

Keep an eye on all the Azari related articles. Please take a look at Shah Ismail. As you know Pan-Turkists try and say he was a Turk who took over Iran instead of he was the King of Iran.

This was written[2] and this was the response [3].

Here is the translation: How are you. To soon to give a complicated comment. These protests have been forming a long time coming and they are ripening, this wan not and necessary the only occasion, so that it would splash out to the streets. The basic problem is the fact that they [Iran?/Persians? I don't know who, but he says they] reject tp the Azaris the right to thei national identity, the right to the development of their own language and distinct culture. You can see even here, in the consideration of articles, Iranian Azarbaijan and Azarbaijanians. Some Iranian participants insist on saying Azaris are an Iranian ethnicity, although it is widely-known that Azaris are Turkic. This is what is being represented or occuring in Iran itself. Conflict apparently on this basis, people [Azaris] require the protection of their cultural rights.

These is only the tip of the ice berg. 72.57.230.179

When are we Going to See Proof that Azaris are Genetically Turkic

Please keep an eye on Azari and the talk:Azari. I have started the following in the discussion.

It has been ages since these citations have not been verified. Verification is needed. If not delete the material. the amount of time granted has been generious. The Azaris Iranian background has been verified through various scientific and academic sources, but the Turkic claim has not. The only think that has been verified is the Turkic langauge. 72.57.230.179

They still have not provided sitations. It is funny when we provide any links with Iran or Iranisn if there is not citations they delte it. ALso they keep on editing the article to say Possible Iranian Background when in fact it is established and proven and more factual and solid than the Turkic background. Watch that please. Can you get admins to watch the page??? 72.57.230.179

The March to War

Look at these; they are well documented. This is the place to keep your eye on... http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=newsHighlights&newsId=18 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=N20060921&articleId=3299 69.196.164.190

Turkish Kurdistan

Ben bu madde hakkında adminlere bir şikayette bulunmayı düşünüyorum bu maddenin adının doğruluğundan şüpheli olan herkesin şikayet etmesinin daha etkili olacağını düşünüyorum bunun için yardım etmek isterseniz cevabınızı bekliyorumOnurRC

Thanks

great content on Iranian scholars of the past...it really bugs me to see Arabs and Turks coming onto wikipedia and changing origins to meet their own agenda...What are they trying to prove anyway? I understand they have rich history and culture, but Arabs, Turks, Mongols were notorious for living by the sword, not by the pen...and they dont seem to understand that there land today WAS occupied by Persians WAAAAAY BEFORE they even arrived and organized their nomadic tribes. Again Ill stay away from ethnocentric remarks, but its really insulting what there doing on wikipage. Anyways, damit garm and great job dadaash, spreading the knowledge..

the following excerpt i read from you and I could not say it ANY BETTER...

"I respect you, and respect the fact that Geber was an important Arab scientist. He was the `Father of Alchemy`. No one has the right to change his origins. But, when you try to tell a culture that its own people, in this case scientists, were of a different race, specially when that country and all the major dictionaries and encyclopedias in the world recognize them as such, then you have created a problem. No one wants their race changed, it takes away from their culture and pride."