User talk:Zmalluzboyz

Welcome!

Shehimo

Dear User:Zmalluzboyz, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially those on the article about the Shehimo. I noticed that you added an image of an Eastern Orthodox icon corner to the article; would you be able to replace that photo with something more suitable to the Oriental Orthodoxy (murals are more characteristic of Indian Orthodox artwork, for example)? If not that's fine. However, I think that this would improve the article. With regards, Anupam^Talk 21:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zmalluzboyz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development

Dear User:Zmalluzboyz, thank you for your message on my talk page. I would love to help you expand that article. However, as of now, there do not seem to be enough references that discuss the Liturgical Resource Development. As such, I think that such a submission would most likely be rejected on Wikipedia, unless more sources become available later. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 17:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The India Star
		Dear Zmalluzboyz, thank you for your wonderful contributions to WikiProject India-related articles, especially your recent edits to the article about Paulose II. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 03:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Zmalluzboyz, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent edits to Shehimo. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 03:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:A barnstar for you!

Dear User:Zmalluzboyz, thank you for the thoughtful barnstar! It has brightened my day and I'm glad to know that my efforts are appreciated on Wikipedia. With warm regards, Anupam^Talk 14:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Catholicos, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Development

Hello, Zmalluzboyz. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Development, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Development

Hello, Zmalluzboyz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ministry of Liturgical Development".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development

Hello, Zmalluzboyz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ministry of Liturgical Resource Development".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mathews Severios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paulose II. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to use edit summaries as much as possible!

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]