User talk:Zkurko

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Alex^{discussion ★} 21:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zkurko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My blocking is yet another violation of Wikipedia rules that are creating all these senseless disputes. I did some research on the other bloggers. That by Scientific Ethics was done with the IP of Sebring, Florida, and that from LouisTheSmall with the IP of Tarpon Springs, Florida. From my IP (Palm Harbor, Florida) there are NO other posts other then mine. I requested to identify what I did wrong in my post n besides being nice and respectful so that I can learn for the future, but you didn't answer. Therefore,m the apparent reason you blocked me at my IP in Palm Harbor is that I was about to suggest a number of papers in refereed journals on Santilli's Lie-admissible formulations. You have three decades of recorded opposition on due scientific process in the field and, therefore, the most plausible reason for blocking me is that you did NOT want me to present these references. In the event I am wrong, please provide some more credible reason for blocking me in the interest of Wikipedia, science, as well as yourself. Zkurko

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 18:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zkurko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been unjustly mixed up with anti-Semitic guys. Please show me where I misbehaved. Thanks, Zkurko

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.