User talk:Zjholder

Welcome!

Hello, Zjholder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zjholder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what your talking about. I don't remember abusing anyone's account, nor would I do anything like that. Besides, I haven't even interacted with anyone or made edits since the middle of October. Zjholder 20:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're talking about this.--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zjholder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that I sockpuppeted users. I know what I did wasn't right and I promise that I will never abuse any user again. If I get unblocked, what I will do to contribute to Wikipedia is revert any vandalism and improve articles Zjholder 17:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Here, you are admitting to violating WP:SOCK. Below, you are very clearly stating that you have not. It is not possible for both statements to be truthful. Yamla (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla:That was before I found out I was the one who was in the wrong. I found out via the sockpuppet investigations link and realized that I did something wrong. Zjholder 18:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slander

This user has attempted to engage in block evasion as 205.213.208.101. --Yamla (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:What are you talking about. I may not like the block, but I don't try evading it. You know that some IP addresses are shared among other users.Zjholder 18:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well you know what, goodbye I'm done with Wikipedia. I wanted to help contribute to Wikipedia but never mind I'm retiring. It's not fair that Yamla, EvergreenFir, and DreamyJazz are rogue admins (admins who abuse their admin rights just so they can block others because they have the power to do it). Also it was Killerboy who was sockpuppeting and I had no influence upon it. Plus Checkuser isn't always accurate. So stop slandering and "creating an army of admins" or you could get your admin rights taken away. Bye Felicia! Zjholder 18:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Edit war

Hi! I've noticed that one of your sockpuppets is engaged in an edit war with someone on As Told by Ginger's page. Could you tell me who so I can report them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namethatisnotinuse (talk • contribs) 15:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]