User talk:Ziv2000

April 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Crimea.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 18:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crimea. Discuss on the Talk page; if you fail to do so, and repeat the edit, you will be blocked. General Ization ^Talk 18:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ziv2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block request was made by trolls trying to provide/preserve false information on Crimea. They, trolls, defended a record in the table that attributes Crimea to Russia. This is a false statement as Crimea was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014. There is international consensus that Crimea belongs to Ukraine. The fact that Wikipedia allows Russian trolls to control its policy is very troublesome tendency that ultimately will undermine Wikipedia credibility. Wikipedia should never attribute illegally occupied territory of one country to another country, in this case Russia, as it did in this article. Wikipedia should uphold the international law not intentionally violate it.

Decline reason:

Only one unblock request at a time, please. See below. Huon (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If there is "international consensus" there should be a multitude of reliable sources for you to cite to support that claim, yet you refused to cite even one or to discuss on the article's Talk page despite warnings from multiple editors. Wikipedia says what reliable sources, cited in the article, say. By the way, I am neither Russian nor a troll, and you risk an extension of your block if you fail to treat other editors here with civility. General Ization ^Talk 20:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ziv2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I do believe you are a Russian troll or a proxy. You block request was immediately supported by guys such as "Kosack". Its name alone immediately points to Russian connection. You work either in coordination with those trolls or use multiple logins. You use Wikipedia rules to spread Russian propaganda. "Editor Kosack" is another Russian troll that helps create a picture of "warning from multiple editors". Stop spreading Putin's misinformation. It will be very unfortunate if Wikipedia becomes something similar to Wikileaks, a source of Kremlin's propaganda...

Decline reason:

Only one unblock request at a time, please. See below. Huon (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Whatever. Obviously you do not care to consider good advice. Admin, please revoke TPA and consider indef. General Ization ^Talk 20:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ziv2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not surprised by your request. As a troll of the foreign government, Russia, you try to spread misinformation by suppressing ability of others to provide the correct information. Again and again you question status of Crimea as of Ukrainian territory that is currently occupied by Russia.

Decline reason:

I have extended the block to a week since you show a complete lack of awareness of the problems with your edits and your conduct. An indefinite block may well have been warranted, and if you do not change your approach to working in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia, that's what will happen. Huon (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ziv2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Huon and General Ization are involved into suppressing ability of the public to express the truth. They use trolls, Kosack, and bots, ClueBot NG, to submit false reports about vandalism, etc. It is enough to check the history of this issue to understand that. Both, Huon and General Ization show total disrespect of international law. They hide their agenda behind 'cooperative environment' claims - very sad that Wikipedia becomes manipulated by trolls and foreign, in this case Russian, agents.

Decline reason:

As you are continuing to make personal attacks, I have increased this block to indefinite - you will not be unblocked until you change your approach to collaborative editing. Also, if I see one more personal attack here, I will revoke your ability to edit this talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ziv2000 reported by User:General Ization (Result: ). Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Widr (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]