User talk:Zithan

Blocked

This account has been blocked by the Arbitration Committee per Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Nichalp. — Coren ^(talk) 22:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ken Underwood

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ken Underwood, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy WP:ANYBIO - hasn't received any notable award; hasn't "made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field". Reads like an advertisment.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Laurent (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ken Underwood

I have nominated Ken Underwood, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Underwood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Laurent (talk) 17:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sextoy.com

A tag has been placed on Sextoy.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 23:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Levine

A tag has been placed on Dave Levine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 02:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sextoy.com logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sextoy.com logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Clement Bowman

I have nominated Clement Bowman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clement Bowman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cirt (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Broncolor

I have nominated Broncolor, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broncolor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cirt (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dalberg Global Development Advisors

I have nominated Dalberg Global Development Advisors, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalberg Global Development Advisors. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cirt (talk) 07:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Click4Carbon

I have nominated Click4Carbon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Click4Carbon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DGG (talk) 13:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Porn Awards

Of interest? Power.corrupts (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to roll back the too bold change - comments? Power.corrupts (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Click4carbon_screenshot.png

I have tagged File:Click4carbon_screenshot.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. MER-C 11:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FOBA logo.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FOBA logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Zithan/sandbox2

User:Zithan/sandbox2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zithan/sandbox2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Zithan/sandbox2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Undead Warrior (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dalberg Global Development Advisors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dalberg Global Development Advisors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalberg Global Development Advisors (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dalberg logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dalberg logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing performance measurement

Marketing performance measurement, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 10:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NDIA logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NDIA logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Afd notice|Marketing performance measurement|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing performance measurement} Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dalberg offices.svg

The file File:Dalberg offices.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 12:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sextoy.com revenue chart 2008.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sextoy.com revenue chart 2008.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Qualifying industrial zones in Jordan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qualifying industrial zones in Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qualifying industrial zones in Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

〜 Festucalex • talk 11:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dalberg logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dalberg logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]