User talk:Ziq75

Machine translations from French

Hello, Ziq75, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I notice you have recently created pages Richard Bellon and Sophie Ferracci using the ContentTranslation tool. It is not helpful to the project to create machine translations like this and leave them as articles. May I ask what your level of fluency in French is, and whether you plan to go back and fix up these new articles by comparing them to the original French and fixing any translation errors you encounter? Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 00:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mathglot,

Sorry for this late answer, i was far away.

To answer your question: i am french and 100% fluent in french, but of course less fluent in english. Perhaps it will be errors of syntax or spelling, when i translate french into english, but no problem of meaning.

Could you tell me why my other translation from french wiki has been deleted, i think its a mistake

thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziq75 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell you why specifically, but read the Afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Bellon and that discusses the reasons why.

(If you reply, please reply here not on my TP, and {{ping}} me; thanks.) Mathglot (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using citations

One of Wikipedia's core principles is verifiability. This means, that claims made in articles should be backed up with references from reliable sources. I noticed you recently added some languages to the table at Languages of Cameroon, but you didn't cite any sources. Please find sources for this information, and add them to the article. You can find more information at WP:REF, and this tutorial might help. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ziq75, I undid your earlier edit, but don't worry, you can just put it back again. Just make sure to add some citations from reliable sources. Thanks! Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Bellon

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Richard Bellon, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 09:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Bellon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Bellon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Bellon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 02:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translations from French

Using citations

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Bellon

Nomination of Richard Bellon for deletion

A page you started (Sophie Ferracci) has been reviewed!