User talk:Zimzilabim
I have enacted a 72 hour block on this account, pending a satisfactory answer to the question of why you are making so many "white space" edits to the encyclopedia. While I have noted a reason of "disruption" for the sanction, I am not making a judgement on the effect of your edits. I am however concerned that you are disrupting the community, especially in respect of your response to the previous question asked.
Please note that if you replace this notice with gibberish, as you have with the previous enquiry, I shall increase the sanction tariff to indefinite (for as long as there is no satisfactory answer) as I will if you simply ignore this and resume your editing when the block ends.
Please can you answer the following; what is your purpose for the large quantity of blank space edits? LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
{{unblock|Unaware of editing, new to Wiki was tooling with functions, apologize, would like account unblocked}}
Can you explain these whitespace edits? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 19:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Zimzilabim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I read articles on the edit page and submit erroneously. Sorry a novice
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified sockpuppet of Bobfran. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Bobfran (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to Checkuser for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |