User talk:Ziggyseventh

Welcome

Hello, Ziggyseventh, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Lady Gaga

Hey, thanks for your concern for the article. Unfortunately, the article has never been a featured article, so it is not subject to to featured article review, which is for FAs that aren't up to scratch. The peer review was a good idea, though, because that's a good venue for getting feedback on the article. If you need any help with anything, please just drop me a line and I'll be happy to help. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page ICANN has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --N419BH (talk) 02:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 03:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lady GaGa's fashion was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! --ANowlin: talk 05:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Take It Off (song), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Animal (Kesha album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Breakthrough (album). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 03:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Animal (Kesha album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sparks Fly, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Sparks Fly. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 23:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katy Perry

Hello! I noticed that you placed a featured article candidate banner at the article's talk page. It is currently a good article, but most articles have a peer review before being nominated for featured article status, whether they've been reviewed as good articles or not. Also, in this case, the artist is about to release a new album, so it would probably be more appropriate to wait until that album is properly covered in the artist's article so that the artist's article will be more comprehensive. You could start a peer review now, if you'd like, but a featured article nomination is something you should probably discuss on the talk page before going ahead with it. Cheers, Cliff smith ^talk 17:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Sparks Fly. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fixer23 (talk) 00:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bella Swan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bella Swan was changed by Ziggyseventh (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-08-26T20:28:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:28, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving disambiguation page

Hello, the correct name for disambiguation pages is without the prefix (disambiguation) unless there is a primary topic - see WP:DABNAME. Writing because of this move[1] --Christian75 (talk) 07:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Snooki Song (Parody of "Tik Tok" by Kesha)

A tag has been placed on The Snooki Song (Parody of "Tik Tok" by Kesha) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 19:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ziggyseventh

Hi Ziggyseventh. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. I think it's fair to warn you that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets very high standards for editors running for adminship. That being said, I strongly urge you to read WP:GRFA, User:Davidwr/Administration is not for new users, and WP:NOTNOW, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that RfA and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FAR

I would ask you to see this page. You are not a main contributor of the article, and if you believe that it is a FA, it is not, so do not add arbitrary featured article reviews without contacting main contributors. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 03:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nicki Minaj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 16:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confederate States of America

I saw you interest in joining a project to further the scope of CSA article. I was thinking of having a task force instead of an entire project as there seems to be a lot of overlapping WikiProjects anyways. I was wondering if you would still be interested in joining this task force?

A few suggestions for parent projects were Military History, American Civil War, and North America. I was leaning towards the latter as the CSA goes beyond simply the war. All advice would be appreciated.(Lihaas (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Kesha peer review

Hello, I've left some comments about Kesha at Wikipedia:Peer review/Kesha/archive2. --Beloved Freak 21:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lady GaGa's fashion concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lady GaGa's fashion, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 11:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Lady GaGa's fashion

Hello Ziggyseventh. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Lady GaGa's fashion.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lady GaGa's fashion}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]