User talk:Ziggymaster

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Ziggymaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

You seem pretty at home already. :) Thank you for your great work on North Korea!

Again, welcome! Siawase (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reunification

Sorry but I have reverted you again.

I see most of the things that I removed as pure original research - perhaps the population could be included, but the problems with that are 1. we can't cite wikpedia 2. the population will have changed if/when the countries unify. A potential solution (and I am not sure how suitable it would be for the lead) would be a table listing current stats ie. financial/military/population/area with a combined total - not suggesting that these figures would apply if they countries unified, but merely stating the current status of each country. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 06:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Republic of Korea-United States Free Trade Agreement a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Caspian blue 18:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

Thank you for your interest in the South Korea page. Until recently the page was under protection due to rampant vandalism and edit-warring. Due to these problems and others the talk page for such a controversial article is especially important. Improvements to the article are welcome, but please feel free to post any proposals you have for improving the article on the Talk Page first. Concerning the templates placed, I put them there because these section are either completely unsourced, or have only one source. In this way, it is more appropriate to tag a section than simply add citation needed to every sentence in the section, (although others have done that.) If you check the "proposals" section you can find what I plan to improve, and my reasoning for the changes. RlndGunslinger (talk) 23:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage pregnancy

Ziggymaster, please stop deleating parts of the article "teenage pregnancy". Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.8.157 (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to teen pregnancy - unexplained deletion, etc.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from teenage pregnancy. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Also please consider wp:brd. Zodon (talk) 00:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry about the duplicate reminder - the post above about teenage pregnancy wasn't there when I added this one - must have been at same time). Zodon (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

other accounts

are Wondergirls and Lakshmix also your accounts? カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is my only Wikipedia account. I have restored some of your removals in the intro and economy section as they are sourced facts. Thanks. Ziggymaster (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only account? Is it coincidence that this account was created on dec 26th, ONE MINUTE after wondergirls made their last edit of 2008? Your edits on Chaebol where you take over from Lakshmix make it very obvious that both accounts are yours. The fact that from December 26th both wondergirls and Lakshmix make no edits, but the very newly created account of yours has so many edits makes it obvious that one account took over from the original two. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 18:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_in_international_relations&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=High-speed_rail&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korean_wave&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teenage_pregnancy&limit=500&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaebol&action=history

want me to dig up some more? カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made it clear that I have no relations with the aforementioned users. I edit the articles I like, which are Korean-related. Thanks. Ziggymaster (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the times/dates of your edits, the articles shared with the other two accounts and the fact that you don't only share articles, but on those articles you have the same point of view, excuse me if I don't believe you. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ask you to believe anything, that is your personal judgement. I don't mind whoever you think I am, what is more important to me are articles related to Korea that I am ensuring is not under-represented on Wikipedia. Remember, we are on the internet where anonymitity is respected. Anyway, I would appreciate if we can end our conversation about me here. Thanks. Ziggymaster (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, what is more important is that you do not try to gain consensus and bypass rules relating to edit warring and multiple accounts - your motives are of no interest to me. And I am afraid that online you are held accountable for your actions, just like in real life - of course I am a mere editor here and don't have access to functions such as "check user" but the only advice I can offer you is - if you don't like people looking into your edits and confirming that all of your accounts are linked to the same person - don't make multiple accounts. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://toolserver.org/~erwin85/contribs.php?lang=en&family=wikipedia&users=Ziggymaster%7CLakshmix%7CWondergirls+&limit=2500&submit=Submit カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KTX

Ziggymaster, you have now removed a certain section of the KTX article twice: first without giving any explanation, the second time, ignoring my query on the Talk page of the KTX artile, with a short explanation lacking any specifics. To boot, your stated reason, that the deleted part was "outdated", does not seeem to be true for even parts of what you deleted.

If you think that that part doesn't belong into the article, given that others disagree, the proper way is to state your arguments in detail, in the Talk page of the KTX article. --Rontombontom (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

please be aware of the three revert rule on the South Korea article.

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a Yeoido picture

[1] I found that you change the explanation of this picture to Yeoido. But, as you see in this picture there is Hyundai I'Park building [2] And it is located in Gangnam, not Yeoido. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Byeonggwan (talk • contribs) 16:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my image of national parks of korea is inapproprite? Don't you know how important they are? Have you been one of them?

And I don't understand why you insist that it is Yeoido picture. There is NO Yeoido in this image. [3] This is in front of COEX, which is in Gangnam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.8.215 (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[4] I-Park Tower which houses the headquarters of Hyundai Development Corporation in Samseong-dong, Seoul

See? Samseong-dong is in Gangnam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Byeonggwan (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR report

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Ziggymaster_reported_by_Sennen_goroshi_.28Result:_.29 カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 19:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I hate to do this, but you have indeed broken the three-revert rule on South Korea, and continued reversions after the warning above. Please refer to the report at the 3RR noticeboard. I have blocked you for 8 hours, and ask you to review the three-revert rule to ensure that you are familiar with it. -- Samir 03:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

92.233.108.66

Ziggymaster, please don't use anon IPs to edit in order to get around edit waring rules or to gain false consensus.

On a personal note, you were concerned about your privacy online - an IP address reveals a lot of things about your location, you should use an account, it is much more secure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/92.233.108.66

http://samspade.org/whois/92.233.108.66

the above is what is revealed by your IP - this is honest advice, if you like remaining anonymous online DON'T use an IP to edit. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 03:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

In January, you wrote on User:Momomomomistake's userpage, not talk page. I have moved it over to the talk page (which apparently has since been deleted). SKS2K6 (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]