User talk:Ziegfest
The paragraph you keep inserting in the Patrick McHenry article links to a blog which is not a reliable source, and the photos posted there are obviously doctored. I've now removed it twice, and if you insert it a third time, this will go to mediation. Patrick McHenry is perfectly capable of making himself look foolish without people making things up. JTRH (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Your removal of the quote by Rothenberg in the Patrick McHenry article is a fair edit. Point taken. Thanks. Ystava (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
I moved your comment from my user page to my talk page where it belongs. The two links you keep inserting are not neutral external links. Neither link is of repute as you claim. The database is community edited and has very low membership in comparison to Congresspedia (another community edited database). The other site you reference has only been quoted in a letter to the editor, both of which were written by the same person. That does not qualify it as a reliable source. --Ystava (talk) 12:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Patrick T. McHenry. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
I responded to you on my talk page. I have requested assistance. Instead of waiting for community consensus and working through this dispute following wiki guidelines, you just keep reverting and are now making accusations. Admins are able to see that my IP is connected to my account alone. In addition, the link you continue posting is now saying that it has a relationship with you which appears to put you in violation of WP:COI. Ystava (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)