User talk:Zhuojun

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Adrian M. H., was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you want to contact an editor, please do so in the correct manner, which does not include posting spam material. If you want your material to be turned into an article, try Articles for creation. Adrian M. H. 00:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Norman K. Denzin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Norman K. Denzin. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Norman K. Denzin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Norman K. Denzin. Thanks! StarryGrandma (talk) 03:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman K. Denzin (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was:

This reads like an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia article. He has had a major impact on his field and you don't need to build a case by so much emphasis on "wonderfulness". That stuff has to go. Stick to facts as provided by references. Read Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Information style and tone and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Puffery. You are using close paraphrase of book reviews, which is not allowed as copyright violations. Read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I've found a reference for much of the biographical material and put it under External links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norman K. Denzin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StarryGrandma (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Zhuojun, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StarryGrandma (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman K. Denzin (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Selected works needs putting in a wikitable, the lead section is a bit flowery.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norman K. Denzin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 17:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Norman K. Denzin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Norman K. Denzin. Thanks! StarryGrandma (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zhuojun. I've looked at your article again and made some changes but there is much left to do. Denzin is a major academic figure with a large impact on his field, but you have buried that by writing an essay about his wonderfulness rather than writing an encyclopedia article. All opinions, unless directly from sources, must go. Your conclusions must go. Start with his education and academic career. Look at an example like Rae Langton. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman K. Denzin (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see independent, third-party coverage of the subject or he needs to pass WP:PROF. These super lengthy explanation into his research is probably not warranted at this time, as it alone would not really be considered notable enough to be included in the encyclopedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norman K. Denzin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman K. Denzin has been accepted

Norman K. Denzin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]