User talk:Zhuo1221

Welcome

Hello, Zhuo1221 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox expand

Good morning Zhuo.I think it's pretty complete now, but it would be nice if the Affiliates section could be expanded and supplemented. AYAO32269 (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Please see feedback your friends left you at User talk:Zhuo1221/sandbox _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from @Hanjiseung

Good evening @Zhuo1221

I read your article well. I think it would have taken a lot of effort to write it. Since it covers a lot of text, why not attach some pictures to make it easier for the viewer to understand. I think you can find some relevant content at Wikipedia Commons. Hanjiseung (talk) 11:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, China News Service, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Always best to stick to reliable WP:SECONDARY sources and avoid WP:COPYPASTE. Amigao (talk) 19:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that. Since all my quoted sources originate from Chinese information, the channels are reliable. But is it because they are all in Chinese that you consider them unreliable? I'm sorry to disturb your break, as I'm a new student on the wiki editing team. I hope I can get your advice. Thanks. Zhuo1221 (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:PST. Always best to source with reliable WP:SECONDARY sources. Amigao (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No original research states that reliable sources include content published in magazines, journals and books by reputable publishers. I have published content from well-known publishers such as ChinaNews.com, ChinaGov.com, and others. Is there any content that you are not satisfied with? Did all of the content strike you as unreliable information? Or is it the information about China News Service from official Chinese publishers that you find unreliable? I hope to get your reply, thanks. Zhuo1221 (talk) 09:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChinaNews.com is a WP:PRIMARY source for this article. Please cite uninvolved secondary WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I wrote is very objective and all based on evidence, if you think you can't use ChinaNews.com's content, then I wrote content from other Chinese publishers as well, and all of you deny the fruits of my labour. I want you to write Wikipedia objectively, not just describe China's international news agency based on your subjective ideas. The history I wrote is the development of China News Service, isn't it more detailed and accurate than what Chinese publishers give? Is there any error in my editing of the past leaders of the China News Service and its organisational set-up? If you think there are mistakes, I hope you will point them out clearly, instead of just deleting the fruits of other people's labour according to your own ideas. For a national news agency of China, I think it should not only have statements from foreign countries, but should edit Wikipedia information in a comprehensive way. Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to use the information posted on ChinaNews.com. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, WP:SELFPUB

WP:SELFPUBLISH. Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to use the information posted on ChinaNews.com. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, WP:SELFPUB

WP:SELFPUBLISH. Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source you cited does not satisfy the five criteria of WP:ABOUTSELF. Amigao (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I post content that conforms to Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Zhuo1221 (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDEPENDENT might offer some additional clarification. Amigao (talk) 04:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Cang Xin

added a link pointing to Cang

Hugo Shong

added a link pointing to Xiong

Jin Ming

added a link pointing to Jin

Tie Yinghua

added a link pointing to Tie

Wan Da

added a link pointing to Wan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for checking out my problem, I've gone ahead and changed the edit.Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About Sandbox Editor

Good evening, Zhuo. I skimmed through your sandbox edits and see that you have refined and revised the content as per the professor's request. I think you're ready to try posting it. Thanks.AYAO32269 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chen XinHai moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chen XinHai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]