User talk:Zhorony

Peer Review

Lead paragraph does include a useful definition and overview of the topic

Key Points: • Definition of term • Two types of representative bureaucracy (passive and active) • Some people support it and some are definitely against its practicality • Samuel Krislov published a book about the subject that is considered definitive

Core material seems to be covered though it could use some more information

References are provided and citations are used effectively

The topic is clear, however, I would suggest adding more about passive and active representative bureaucracy.

The contribution provides multiple points of view. I would suggest adding some more information to each perspective though.

Good job of not allowing the article to side with one stance or the other.References are provided throughout the document.

The article has plenty of references. They are scholarly and peer reviewed.The language used in most of the article is effective. I would look at the Importance section. It seems that section needs to be adjusted so it does not sound partial to one point of view.

There are several typos which need to be addressed throughout the article.

Simple English is used so it should be readable by anyone.

Hey Zach, I already know you but for the purposes of this class I'm saying hi!

Welcome!

Hello, Zhorony, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography

Adler, J.H. (2014). How much discretion does the executive branch have over immigration policy? The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/01/how-much-discretion-does-the-executive-branch-have-over-immigration-policy/

GAROFALO, C. (2008). With Deference to Woodrow Wilson. Public Integrity, 10(4), 345-354.

Kahng, L. (2013). The IRS Teas Party Controversy and Administrative Discretion. Cornell Law Review Online, 9941A. Retrieved from: http://cornelllawreview.org/clronline/the-irs-tea-party-controversy-and-administrative-discretion/

Martin Shapiro, Administrative Discretion: The Next Stage, 92 Yale L.J. 1487 (1982) Retrieved from: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs/1706

SHANE, P. M. (2013). The Rule of Law and the Inevitability of Discretion. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 36(1), 21-28.

Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700-710.