User talk:Zetret

Welcome!

Hello, Zetret! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 07:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Sources for medical topics

Hello Zetret. Welcome to Wikipedia and medical editing, such as for perspective on Ayurveda. When making substantial changes to an article (lede for Ayurveda), we need consensus among several editors, explained in WP:CON. Meanwhile, for background on choosing sources for medical content, you may find these resources below useful. Good luck; following you here if you wish to discuss. (Note: please sign and date your Talk page comments using the 'pencil' icon in the upper left of the edit box). --Zefr (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Medicine video guide for new medical editors, #1

Wikiproject Medicine tutorial for new medical editors, #2 here

Wikiproject Medicine resources summary, here

A review of the history and practices of medical content on Wikipedia is good reading, here. --Zefr (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from [[:|Arranged marriage in the Indian subcontinent]] to Marriage (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa Diannaa - Can you help move the content there please? It's just better to have that detail under the History section. I don't understand why this is a big deal that warrants total deletion of content. You could have simply added the attribution if you knew the source (a simple search could have shown that).