User talk:Zesd

Zesd, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zesd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Palatine tonsil

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from Mucosal Immunology edited by Jiri Mestecky, page 1554 and 1999. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

References

Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
2. Then click on "templates",
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
4. If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

We do not use primary sources for medical content. Associations do not equal causes. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Zesd you have not addressed the concerns raised here[1]. Can you explain what happened? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

@Doc James: I don't understand what the problem is. Every time I was very careful and used proper references. But still, any change I made was reverted within a matter of hours, if not minutes. Zesd (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

So you remain of the position that:

"The Canadian Cancer Society mentions tonsillectomy as a possible risk factor for Hodgkin's lymphoma, although it stresses that more research is necessary."

means the same thing as:

"Unknown risk factors It isn’t known whether or not the following factors are linked with Hodgkin lymphoma previous surgery to remove the tonsils or the appendix"

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

@Doc James:Well, basically yes. They Canadian Cancer Society literally says "More research is needed to see if the following are risk factors for Hodgkin lymphoma." Apparently there are reasons to believe that tonsillectomy increases the risk of attracting Hodgkin's disease (such as several studies that found a significant correlation between tonsillectomy and Hodgkin's disease). Otherwise, no more research would be needed. Zesd (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Hum. It specifically calls these "unknown risk factors" and yet you turned it into "possible risk factors"... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:11, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Changing against the consensus at the RfC

There is clear consensus at the RfC currently. Please do not edit against clear consensus. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Poor ref

This is not a suitable ref https://www.praxisvita.de/wann-braucht-mein-kind-eine-mandelentfernung-12748.html

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Street performance, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Continued efforts to go against consensus

We developed consensus here[2]. You will need to develop a different consensus if you wish something different. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for your help with lymph node. A lot of that set of articles are a bit of a mess so it's much appreciated to have a second pair of eyes. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

PS Let me know if you'd like to collaborate on any anatomical articles in the future :). --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

@Tom (LT):Thank you for your cupcake! I'm planning to make more edits in the Lymph node article in the near future. If there are any other articles that I can assist you with, just let me know. Zesd (talk) 14:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)