User talk:ZeroSD

This is ZeroSD's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryk E. Spoor (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Specifically needs all majorly published reviews as that's substantial for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryk E. Spoor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryk E. Spoor has been accepted

Ryk E. Spoor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 17:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 7curator78 (talk) 01:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.... did you just start this to try and get people to stop disagreeing with you? ZeroSD (talk) 01:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shared Universe and Universal Monsters

Just as a heads up, I removed your edit here here and replaced it with sourced content as it didn't have any sources and contained original research. While it was not malicious and definitely not done in a way to try to make the article worse, we still require sources for most content on wikipedia. I've replaced it with some sourced content, and would welcome your input on it on the talk page as you were among the few discussing the content in the first place. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly appreciated, it's been awhile since I've edited much and I'm out of habit. ZeroSD (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If you need any brushing up, I'll be happy to help if I can. I hope the content still figures in well with what you wanted. I've made a similar change to your edit on the list article you edited recently as well. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]