User talk:Zeravlanayrb

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of ECW500 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

May 2009

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Tnxman307 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Badgernet ₪ 09:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:GaryColemanFan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Badgernet ₪ 09:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:McJeff, you will be blocked from editing. Badgernet ₪ 09:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I don't understand. Could you please elaborate? Zeravlanayrb (talk) 09:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User:GaryColemanFan. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Badgernet ₪ 09:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come on children, let's play nice. Zeravlanayrb (talk) 09:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Menti fisto 09:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You asked on Badgernet's page what you'd done that constituted vandalism -- here's the last several edits that you made, all of which constitute vandalism: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (the list could continue) Banaticus (talk) 09:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]