User talk:ZenZeppelin

Welcome!

Hi FranGallego33! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pigsonthewing Hi! Thanks for the encouragement. Yes, I definitely would like to continue on this community, and perhaps even help improve it. I am still familiarizing myself with the guidelines so your links are very helpful. Thanks again, if I have any doubt in the future I will keep the Teahouse in mind :). FranGallego33 (talk) 10:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello! I'm StefenTower. Your recent edit(s) to the page Hunter S. Thompson appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 21:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stefen, yes, it was a typo. I wrote 63 instead of the correct 73. Its already corrected. FranGallego33 (talk) 18:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. Unfortunately, I'm not able to read minds, and the first addition had the appearance of some kind of disruptive edit. Cheers! Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 18:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ofc! thanks for the help FranGallego33 (talk) 18:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello FranGallego33! Your additions to Lev Gatovsky have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LG article

Repeating refs is preferred to putting a ref just once at the end of a long paragraph, or worse, several paragraphs, or worse! a section title. The reason is that over time, other editors may add and reference more content within a long paragraph, or move stuff. View history can be used to 'rescue' what someone else cut. I often move content into my Sandbox, work there, reference there, then paste into article. Even for experienced editors, Wikipedia rules can be frustrating. Earlier this year I made more than 200 edits to Vitamin C in attempt to raise it from Good Article rating (my work, 2017, one of 19 articles I have raised to GA) to Featured Article rating, only to have the FA review team opine 'not good enough'. I hope that you will decide to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, and in time find the rules and guidelines less onerous. David notMD (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello David,

yes I understand now. I'll also try to make more edits but shorter in content, so its also easier to reverse or edit them without removing the whole entry.

Its surprising to hear what you tell me about the Vitamin C page, it definetely looks more than good. Now I begin to understand why there is so much posted info related to solving online arguments between users...

I definetely need to learn about the different categories of pages, sounds like a fun thing to devote the energy to. The DYK indications, for example, are being very helpful to learn. I'll keep adding (well cited) content until I run out of sources, I have high hopes for this page.

Thanks as always. FranGallego33 (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your edit to Lev Gatovsky has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, ZenZeppelin. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Lev Gatovsky.
Message added 08:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lev Gatovsky

Hello! Your submission of Lev Gatovsky at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! GRuban (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lev Gatovsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All-Union Communist Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]