User talk:Zen611

Welcome to my user talk page.

RE: can't speedy-delete

Hi! Thanks for your ref WP:CSD on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krish seenauth. However, from the article (A7), cause for speedy-delete can include: "Unremarkable people or groups. An article about a real person, group of people, band or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to AFD instead."
Was my error procedural? The article certainly seems to fit this critera. Thanks! Zen611 04:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - my mistake, it can be speedied. Soon after becoming an admin, I was chastised for speedying articles under criteria such as "non-notable" and "advertisement" - while they are both listed under WP:NOT, they are not under WP:CSD. I, in turn, have passed that lesson on to others. After reading your comment, "Speedy delete - 5 (Google) hits, 4 unique", I mistakenly thought that you wanted to speedy it based on non-notability. Yes, it can be speedied under CSD A7 - in fact, I just did! Thanks for pointing that out, though, and sorry for the delay in my response - I have been short on time all weekend long. --M @th wiz 2020 21:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your positive feedback. I'll reference the paragraph in the future. Zen611 19:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of referencing the paragraph with a name, you can always use abbreviations. For example, if something is speediable under the "general" category's first bullet, you can write "speedy deleted per CSD G1." Images is I, articles A, etc. And I'll try not to make my mistake again in the future, either! --M @th wiz 2020 22:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the revert. Lotsofissues 02:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Corrections

Hello. Thank you for the minor corrections to the article on [Levittown, Pennsylvania]. How does one happen to know one there has been substantial revisions, such that you are on the look-out for spelling mistakes and vandalism and the like? 00:25, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Richard Hurst (blondlieut@aol.com)

XCP list

(Sorry I'm behind a firewall which blocks me from editing the AFD request page directly because the text area is too large.)

Maybe the EFF's list already addresses your concern about companies. Wikipedia still has a problem that I've already mentioned about verifiability. Just for the record, I didn't create the AFD request out of any pro- or anti- DRM/Sony stance, but simply from a quality control perspective.—Tokek 05:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin Luk

Hi mate, I'd recommend not listing articles you have tagged for speedy deletion at AFD until an admin has had a chance to come by and have a look at your speedy request. Alvin Luk is an obvious speedy delete, so by creating an AFD too you've made more work for both of us (but especially me as I have to now close the AFD). Not a complaint, just a little bit of advice :) No reply needed. --kingboyk 05:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, a little correction, a user after you tagged it for speedy deletion. Nonetheless, articles like that can be speedy deleted, so to find out more please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. I hope that helps, but if you have any more questions please contact me again on my talk page. --kingboyk 08:56, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for reverting at Brian Herbert, you might be interested to know that one or two users are pushing this POV on matters (the new books are great, no inconsistencies, FH's Jihad was a Terminator-like scenario, etc.) - we are duking it out primarily at Discrepancies (Dune). Lundse 09:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]