User talk:Zeltis

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zeltis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An admin named User:bjweeks has blocked me indefinitely from editting with no reason stated. I have reason to believe this user is either the owner of Transgaming or directly involved with the company. I have not, to my knowledge, broken any of the wikipedia edit rules.

Decline reason:

See below. This block is associated with an OTRS ticket, which means there is some private evidence (in this case, apparently Checkuser) and a very good reason why you were blocked. Please review our policies on tendentious editing, neutrality, using multiple accounts, and assuming good faith. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CU confirmed sockpuppet of Cendant3 (talk · contribs). SPA only used for inserting unsourced, negative rumors into the Cedega and TransGaming Technologies articles. While the accusation that I'm directly involved with TransGaming is cute it just further shows the bad faith nature of this account. BJ^Talk 04:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the OTRS ticket is a complaint regarding the user's actions. The CU check was requested off-wiki, if anybody would like conformation I will ask the CU post here. BJ^Talk 09:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While it is great that you are proud of your Jewish heritage, Wikipedia is not the place for self-promotion and retaliatory conduct just because you do not agree with someone based on your personal association with your fellow Jews, and decide to retaliate against them by imposing a Permanent block. Zeltis (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BJWeeks should be banned for Improper Admin Conduct

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zeltis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I said before, User:Bjweeks is deliberately targeting me as a retaliatory move due to his personal association with certain friends of his at Transgaming. I will be glad to discuss the evidence. User:Bjweeks could not find any valid reason to Permanently Block me, therefore he proceeded to get engaged in a "witch hunt" and happened to find that I had previously abandonned an account, months ago, and decided to call it "Sockpuppeting" and used it as an excuse to Permanently Block me from editing. User:Bjweeks has engaged in vandalism by removing my edits and then blocked me as a form of retaliation for my edits, which he doesn't agree with. I Strongly suggest this person be permanently stripped of Administrator status for making this a personal issue and improper use of Administrator privileges, including 1 - Stalking and Invasion of privacy 2 - Retaliation and 3 - Permanent Blocking for no valid reason. I will be glad to discuss this privatly with neutral Administrators.

Decline reason:

Your only edits consist of adding unsourced negative information to an article, then blaming the Jews when you got blocked. Even discounting the apparent sockpuppetry, your actions are not those of a user acting in good faith to improve the project. Mr.Z-man 18:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.