User talk:Zeeyanwiki/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Zeeyanwiki. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Re:Happy New Year
Wish you a very, very happy and prosperous New Year, Zeeyanketu. :) --smarojit (buzz me) 04:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Wishes For A Happy, Joyous And Prosperous New Year!
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
New Year Wishes
Wishing you a very happy, prosperous New Year. Hope we contribute and make articles better at Wiki.
Arjann (talk) 05:40, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year
Happy New Year to you too.--Najazjalal (talk) 06:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Review
Ok. But which one are you gonna start first - Rowdy Rathore or Barfi?----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 09:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- The "Filming" section has been expanded, so the "Casting" section has been left.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 09:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Dude, YRF TOLD Taran DIRECTLY. Why the f would the producers lie about the cost of the film? Are you for real? Ashermadan (talk) 21:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Even I dont like Taran, nor do I follow him but I can't do anything. YRF always teams up with BOllywood Hungama and they told Taran the budget. Obviously he's shady but that doesn't mean YRF lied. Why would a production company exaggerate the budget so profits seem less? Ashermadan (talk) 21:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Obviously Taran is sold out by production comanies like YRF interact through him. They tell him everything becasue he has a high position in Bollywood and trade circles. Every star does his Movie Talkies show and other things. Taran and Komal are the worst critics but they'er the most well-connected. That's why YRF told him the budget so he could share. We can't do anything, just go with it. Ashermadan (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Re:Page Notice
You can create your own edit notice here. Torreslfchero (talk) 11:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- You need to create a page for the CSD and Prod log on the twinkle preference page. Hope this helps. Torreslfchero (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
School of Rock magazine
I tried a smaller resolution, but the full title "The Paul Green School of Rock magazine" was not readable. I believe this is the smallest resolution that will work. K8 fan (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- In the smaller version, the words "The Paul Green" above the letters C and H of "School" are no longer readable. K8 fan (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Jab Tak
Shouldn't the verdict on the JTHJ page be positive reviews in India? I'm reading over the reviews and most are 3. 3 is positive according to Pleasants table he showed me. What do you think? Ashermadan (talk) 12:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, ill follow that from now on. Ashermadan (talk) 13:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
I note your comment on my talk page. You have not been here very long, and have not as yet gained the benefit of years of experience, which I can claim. This user has been editing for only a few days; we often find that after some messing about, a short block will get editors on the right track, when a longer block would lose a potentially productive editor. On a different level, let me point out that I have been an admin here for nearly six years; if you wish to criticise, please be on firmer ground. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry, I think I was a little too critical there, and I realise that you were trying to be positive. But we do find, in truth, that quite a high proportion of apparent vandals reform after a single, short block. If not, they THEN get an indefinite one. My intention here is always to improve the encyclopedia and reform and educate vandal or incompetent editors; sometimes it works. In this case, we shall see. Please carry on the good work which you have already started doing.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I have been here, it seems like, for ever. If you need advice or help please contact me, either on my talk-page or by e-mail. I always try to help. Happy wikying.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Incidentally, I have looked at your userpage and am delighted to see the various userboxes there: if I can do so without being patronising I would like to say how much I approve of all of them; with the exception of the Chelsea supporter one! But no-one is perfect.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I was joking, really. Keep in touch. But, while we are in contact, which part of India are you in? I know the country fairly well.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
I have been to New Delhi. While some parts you might want to hide, much of the city is beautiful. If I were to say that some of the beauty is because of Lutjens' work, I hope that would not be offensive. I have been to your country five times and have loved every moment of my visits. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the bowl of strawberries.. :) --rahul (talk2me) 14:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Pre-release JTHJ
No man, I'm sorry. You're right. It makes no sense. Music rights and home media make no sense either as thats post release business. I'll fix it. Only the UK subsicy even Taran confirmed and satellite rights for 40 crore are ok. So total should be 55 crore which makes sense. I'm not sure what the deal with the distrubutros is but I'll mention that in distributor share. Sorry, I apologize. You were right. Ashermadan (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Can you check it now and tell me if it's ok or I need to change something else? I cleaned it up and made it more specific. Also, if you think it's fine now also tell me on my talk page. just say it's fine now. Ashermadan (talk) 18:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: Something to ask
Please feel free to ask anything :) —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:31, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Why confusion of gross figures on Jab Tak Hai Jaan Page
u told dont include personal confusion on Son Of Sardaar , these confusions are due to diffenrent figures by other Independent sources like Bollywood Hungama, Koimoi ,Taran Adarsh, Komal Nahta which give ₹ 105 crore in India nett. The same confusion is given on Jab Tak Hai Jaan page, and I quote: "There was confusion over the Jab Tak Hai Jaan figures in India. While Box Office India stated that the film made around 102 crore (US$18.56 million) nett, trade analysts Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta claimed it reached a figure 17% higher at around 120 crore (US$21.84 million) nett during the same period of time" Why the confusion related things are still existing on Jab Tak Hai Jaan page.Why wikipedia is not having the same rule on every bollywood movies' page. User talk:Abhinavname 13:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- My name is Abhinav Ghosh. Why u r telling Sanjeet. I dont know this crap guy.And if u r also following BOI,then why that confusion section is on Jab Tak Hai Jaan page. User talk:Abhinavname 14:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- I dont know why you are calling me with this name .I am happy with my name and I am proud to be a Bengali.User talk:Abhinavname 14:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 15:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Barfi! GA
Hi, our plan for the GA nomination of Barfi! has been postponed to 1st February 2013 because of some problems. Till you improve Rowdy Rathore as much as you can. P.S. - I am very, very sorry for talking rudely to you earlier.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 16:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you don't remember, then leave it. Anyways, keep up the good work!----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 14:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Reply
Of course its possible. See, RT aggerates the rating by counting how many reviews are positive and negative. For example, if 50 reviews are positive and 50 reviews are negative, the film will get an 50% "rotten" rating (because the "fresh" rating starts from 60%). And JTHJ got 5 positive reviews and 0 negative reviews, that's why the rating is 100%. Speaking about the consensus, no film gets a consensus if there are lesser than 30 or 50 reviews. Kudos----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 18:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Me too... :| But if the reviewers like the film really much, we have no choice. Kudos again.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 18:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
JTHJ and Agneepath
I updated the JTHJ page, took out rotten tomatoes, only added it as a review source for overseas reviews. I also added positive and negative table on agneepath and addressed the concerns some people had on the talk page. Please accept this as a peace offering. Seriously, I hope the changes I made on JTHJ (A LOT OF CHANGES) are good enough now. Too k make it neutral. What do you think? Seriously, stop fighting and work with me. Ashermadan (talk) 04:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Could you check and make sure JTHJ is not biased or has odd language? Tell me yes or no. Or if there are other things for concern. Ashermadan (talk) 13:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Checked?
Did you read the article? Did you get a chance? Ashermadan (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Re:Review
Hi Zee. Just give me a day or two, and I will read the article. Cheers. :) --smarojit (buzz me) 14:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:BoxofficeIndia.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:BoxofficeIndia.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Rowdy Rathore
Hi Zee. I just went through the article, and IMO there are several things that need to be done if you want to nominate it for GA.
- Firstly, make sure that the sources provided are reliable. For example, OneIndia, Thestar.co.ke, Bestmediainfo etc aren't reliable.
- Secondly, the good sources that are provided need to be formatted correctly. You can go through the articles of Vidya Balan, Priyanka Chopra etc to see how the references need to be formatted. For example, newspaper sources need to be italicised, a uniform pattern needs to followed for the dates and naming the web sources etc.
- Thirdly, the prose too looks weak at this point. For example, ".Popular Tamil actor Vijay make friendly appearance in "Chinta Ta" song, Prabhudeva himself appeared in the song. Kareena Kapoor did a friendly appearance." And most of the sentences in the prose are of similar quality.
- So, I think the article needs a complete overhaul before you can nominate it for GA. I suggest you to read through other Hindi film "good articles" before you start working on it. After that, going through a peer review would be a good course of action. Cheers. :) --smarojit (buzz me) 10:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jalwa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action, Thriller and Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Film Fail Awards
Film Fail Awards are a reliable source as a panel of esteemed critics decided them. And, Golden Kela, Ghanta, Zee, Colors Screen, Filmfare, etc. all had public voting so that argument goes out the window. As long as they're talked about in the media and are affiliated with reliable sources like Rajeev Masand (CNN-IBN), Anirudhha Guha (DNA India), Baradwaj Rangan (The Hindu), Mihir Fadnavis (Mid-Day), Raja Sen (Rediff), and Rituparna Chatterjee (CNN-IBN) it's RS. We had this discussion during the Ghantas and Kela debate and this was decided. If you have an issue please discuss this on the talk page as Filmfail awards have more credibility than the Kelas which you supported and which aren't even affiliated with any critic and also have public voting. Look at the two referecnes below to understand how they're RS. You cannot be the judge of what is RS, we have to abide by Wikipedia rules. From your message it is clear that you did not bother to read the jury section or even open the about section. So next time, before messaging me, please read the website properly.
https://twitter.com/RajeevMasand/status/294085421967765506
http://filmfailawards.com/jury/
Ashermadan (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Dabangg 2 Talk
Please discuss why Film Fail Awards aren't RS on the Dabangg 2 talk page. All signs point to them being RS because the names affiliated with them are the top critics in India. Ashermadan (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
First Read
Maybe you should read the jury section first for the Film Fail Awards and then speak. I don't have time for your games. Please comment on the Dabangg 2 page and don't revert the edit as you will be in violation of the 3 RR rule. Ashermadan (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep on complaining
Keep on complaining against me. You are just angry that Salman Khan was nominated. You supported user voted awards like Golden Kelas but you aren't supporting this even though some of the top critics in India have chosen the films and are part of the awards? Wow. Good job! Why are you so hypocritical? Can you please explain to me why Golden Kelas were included and Film Fail aren't? Both are user voted. Ashermadan (talk) 22:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Civility and you
Please note that edits like this are not constructive. I understand you're involved in a dispute with the editor in question, but, as I said; saying things like that does not improve the situation. Your understanding is appreciated, m.o.p 23:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok,Thanx for intervention.---zeeyanketu talk to me 23:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Here, facebook.com/madan.asher add me. Ashermadan (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
editing
why did you edit my comment on cocktail 2012 movie??? dont you dare to do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.109.176 (talk) 09:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Removing my Edit on Race 2
Hi, I very much appreciate the fact that you are taking ownership of Race2 page and making corrections.I have included the aggregator because in that page i was able to see all the reviews.I felt that it would be easy for all the users of race 2 wiki page to read the reviews since that page covered all the reviews.I feel we are very small people to judge a website since those website guys very well know who is a good critic and whose is bad.We are not the correct judge of that.I see some of the blogs are included in the current reviews.I request you to please revert back my edit as good faith.Let the users decide who is a good critic and who is not.Our decision does not matter.Hoping you would revert my edit.Pavanteja324 (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Appreciate your effort on the page . Have a nice day buddy.
race 2 reviews
Hi, Thx for the quick response.Yes as you said there is always this debate about websites being beter or not but as i said we cannot control what the website adds right.But keeping the overall essense of review aggregation in mind and the vistiors of wiki will have i think it would be nice and better if we add that.I checked the website once again and looks like the websites you mentioned have not written anything bad abt the movie and have rated 3.5.So lets go ahead and keep that aggregator and let the users select which review the want to read.Still respecting your thoughts but hoping you will consider. Thx once again for effort. Pavanteja324 (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Thx
Hi Buddy, Thx for the gesture.It is people like you who make wiki a great place.I have learnt some thing looking at your past edits.i will try to follow your guidelines from now.Once again thx and good job with the articles.Happy editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavanteja324 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Namak (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Abhijeet
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Box Office India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Box Office India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Box Office India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Vensatry (Ping me) 10:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)