User talk:ZebrahamZA

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 03:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, I have made relevant contributions to the talk pages on the relevant articles. ZebrahamZA (talk) 07:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to do is read WP:SYNTH. You may not add your own observations to Wikipedia. You may only add observations that have been made in reliable secondary sources. Skyerise (talk) 13:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Number of the beast. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 03:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, I have made relevant contributions in regard to the incorrect information that you identified into the talk page of the relevant article. ZebrahamZA (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your two edits on in the article "Mental health of Jesus"

The article concerns a specific issue and there are controversies (mutually questioned opinions for and against) cited in this issue. This is not an article about psychiatry. According to your logic, the "See also" section should also contain links to articles such as "Criticism of religion" or "Criticism of Christianity", but there aren't any. If someone is interested in psychiatry and the controversies surrounding it, they will find an appropriate article. In MOS:SEEALSO it is written: "articles linked should be related to the topic of the article or be in the same defining category". Wikipek (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikipek I'm not sure what you mean by ‘according to my logic’, but that article seems like a subject that precisely belongs to psychiatry, because psychiatry is the discipline of diagnosing mental health (of individuals), which is precisely what the Mental health of Jesus seems to be exploring.

I have left a comment on the article's talk page suggesting that anyone passing by with the time and interest ought to find sources that explore perspectives on the intersections between the Controversies about psychiatry and the mental health of Messianic figures, perhaps with reference to scholarship like that of Mary Boyle (psychologist). ZebrahamZA (talk) 08:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not strictly related to psychiatry. It is a detailed article on the border of psychiatry, neurology, psychology, philosophy, history, theology and religion in general. It also contains the opinions of psychologists, neurologists, philosophers, historians, theologians. If there is an article on the psychiatric examination of the mental health of messianic figures in Wikipedia, it could be linked. But I don't think there is such an article. If there is a specific statement by Mary Boyle on the mental health of Jesus, it could be placed in the article. It is inappropriate to refer readers of this detailed article to very general and broad topics in which very loosely related general issues are discussed. Wikipek (talk) 09:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]