User talk:Zazzer/Archive 6

Copyright issue with M107 .50 caliber

Hello. Concerning your contribution, M107 .50 caliber, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation, M107 .50 caliber appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. M107 .50 caliber has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:M107 .50 caliber and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:M107 .50 caliber with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:M107 .50 caliber.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. .

The text seems to be a cut and paste of copyright material from the same website you copied the image from. On the subject of the image you say "This website holds the copyrights for this picture." whilst tagging it as being under a creative commons license. Looking at that website I can see absolutely no indication that they have released it under that license and as such I have deleted the image also. You cannot merely copy stuff from websites you find and assume it is ok for wikipedia to use it, it is not. --pgk 19:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other images

I notice most of the other images you have uploaded are also tagged in such a way, saying this website holds the copyright whilst tagging the image with a free license. Checking the website does not indicate they have released the image under that license. I will delete these images also. Do not mis tag images, you cannot make assumptions concerning the copyright status of images, we take this very seriously. --pgk 19:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've been through the images and the following lack sufficient source information. I cannot verify if the license you have added is valid or not. If you don't add sufficient source information and if necessary correct the licenses these too will be deleted.

the following you listed as licensed under the GFDL, as book covers I find this highly unlikely and have retagged them for fairuse as book covers. They do then however lack a fairuse rationale which you need to address.

If you have any questions please ask on my talk page. If you have copied text or images from other websites without the appropriate licenses please let me know so I can remove those also. --pgk 20:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And more

[1] appears to be you adding a direct copy of material from here just changing the word German to Nazi. --pgk 21:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gosh, Zzzzzzzzzzzz

It looks as if you might need some friends. Don't cut out potential ones too quickly. Carptrash 21:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Waffenträger

This appears to be a more or less literal translation of parts of [2], it's not easy to tell if you found it translated elsewhere or did a translation (google translate comes very close to the translation in the article). Direct translations are also subject to copyright issues. --pgk 21:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more I missed:

[3] is a copy from here. --pgk 09:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandal warning

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Vicrum200. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cornell Rockey 18:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]