User talk:Zarcu Mihai

Welcome

Hello, Zarcu Mihai, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Lexical similarity data for Aromanian

Hi. I noticed you added Aromanian to the table in the article on Lexical similarity. Do you have a source for those numbers? All the other data in that article come from Ethnologue. It seems surprising to me that French would have a more similar lexis to Aromanian than Romanian. Also it is strange that you used the Arabic language code ar for Aromanian (which has the code rup).

I suppose you know that any information added to Wikipedia must come from reliable sources. Any information that doesn't will have to be removed. — AdiJapan 04:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uuuh sorry I didn't knew the code Aslo I'm a native Aromanian speaker and no Aromanian does not have more lexical similarity to French it is supposed to be at 73 but Aromanian has hundred of words of latin origin not found in Romanian idem, the Aromanian words of latin origin are even closer to Sardinian and Italian than romanian.of course actual Aromanian it is a archaic language but got affected somehow by the 19 sec relatinization.

November 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Italian language, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:United Nations Members.svg.png

A tag has been placed on File:United Nations Members.svg.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indo European Languages Lexis Comparison (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indo European Languages Lexis Comparison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Indo European Languages Lexis Comparison, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zarcu Mihai! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Avīci (01), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 04:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Like I Do (David Guetta, Martin Garrix and Brooks song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Nowhere Fast (Eminem song), you may be blocked from editing. Hayman30 (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]