User talk:ZaraF

Phyllis Chesler

You are invited to a discussion regarding the article "Phyllis Chesler". Kaldari (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ZaraF,

I have removed the following passage from Phyllis Chesler:

Wikipedia Readers Beware! Someone keeps erasing the more accurate and comprehensive information about Dr. Phyllis Chesler. There is no guarantee that what you are reading is up to date, true, or balanced. As quickly as we post the more accurate version, someone quickly and systematically erases it and replaces it with a false, minimal, highly biased version. We will try to do the same on behalf of the truth. If the more accurate and comprehensive version is erased often enough, legal and other action will be considered.

There are a number of things that you should consider before replacing this:

Wikipedia has a policy against the making of legal threats please read WP:LEGAL;
the assertion that you would be in a position to take legal action suggests that you may have a conflict of interest, accordingly, please read WP:COI;
the fact that you use the phrase "we post", suggests that a group of individuals are working together to ensure that this article represents one view of the subject, while your comment may not actually represent the situation please see WP:MEAT;
comment on articles rather than content should be posted to the article's talk page rather than the article; and
it appears that you are actually removing a significant number of references from the article, while accusing others of reducing the article to being a minimal and biased version.

If you feel that one or more individuals are actually vandalising the page please use the user warning machanism see WP:UW, or request administrator intervention rather then getting into an edit war. You should also be very careful about the 3 revert rule please see WP:3RR I am cross posting this to the article's talk page.

FrankFlanagan (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Phyllis Chesler has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 21:19, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phyllis Chesler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your last edit to this article appears to have been a paste of text from another system, by which you overwrote an article in the middle of an edit war, in the process losing all of the Wiki mark-up and references. Please participate in the a discussion rather then continuing to overwrite the article. FrankFlanagan (talk) 21:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Phyllis Chesler. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Katieh5584 (talk) 22:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome (better late than never)

Hello, ZaraF, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kaldari (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phyllis Chesler references

Thanks for adding the references to back up your content additions in Phyllis Chesler. You'll find that this makes a world of difference as to how likely your content is to get deleted or not, especially in regard to controversial topics. Kaldari (talk) 03:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women and Madness

Now there is a dedicated article on the book itself: Women and Madness WhisperToMe (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]