User talk:Zanze123
|
References
[edit]Please confirm the difference between primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Thanks
Zanze123 (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- The following sections will hopefully explain how to make references.
- For the details of what is a primary, secondary, etc. please see WP:PRIMARY. In brief, a primary source is, for example, the website of the company that is the subject of the article. A press release by the company, or a website that showed information about the company and was paid to do so by the company, would also be a primary source. We avoid using primary sources; we look for reliable secondary sources of information.
- For example: If I claim that I am the Queen of England, and write that on my own MySpace website, that would not be an appropriate source. I would have to wait for the BBC News to pick up on my Queenhood, and then I could cite them.
- A tertiary source is something like Wikipedia itself - a 'gatherer of information'. We don't like to cite those; instead, we like to find out where they got their information from, and cite that.
- For more help, you can either;
- Leave a message on my own talk page;
OR - Use another {{helpme}} here,;
OR - Talk to us live, with this or this.
- Best wishes, Chzz ► 17:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
How references work
[edit]Simple references
[edit]These require two parts;
- a)
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
- b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";
== References ==
{{reflist}}
(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)
To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Zanze123/reftest and try it out.
Named references
[edit]Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook"> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/>
Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.
Citation templates
[edit]You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;
Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
| last = Smith
| first = John
| title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
| publication-date = 2001
| publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
| page = 125
| isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>
Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.
For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.
File copyright problem with File:Jenia1.JPG
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Jenia1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Ehret.jpg
[edit]hello, where is the ehret photo from? i'm curious because i would like to use it here. thx, Maximilian (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Walter Siegmeister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Insufficient notability for WP:Author
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Essie Honiball for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Essie Honiball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essie Honiball until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Skeptic from Britain (talk) 03:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Remineralize the Earth
[edit]
Hello, Zanze123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Remineralize the Earth".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)