User talk:Zanderlabs

This is Zanderlabs's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thorsten Zander (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Good news. This person is likely notable and likely qualifies for an article. h-index 27. Passes WP:NPROF #1.

Has issues with promotional tone. Please edit this to be less hypey and more factual. Should avoid words like respected, numerous, noteworthy. Should avoid saying things like "became more determined", that's an opinion.

Please add additional citations. Every paragraph should have a citation. If a citation cannot be found, it is likely WP:UNDUE weight and should not be included. What independent third parties write about people is what we include in our articles, in proportion to how much they write about it. If it is not written about at all by third parties, it should not be included.

Honestly the quickest way to get this approved may just be to delete the following sections: Education, Scientific career, Passive brain-computer interfaces, Neuroadaptive technologies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thorsten Zander and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thorsten Zander, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 00:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noven Linguae

Thank you for taking the time for reviewing the entry. I saw your latest commment questioning the reference about Prof. Dr. Zander claiming that we cannot reference his own paper to support that he´s the inventor of the term "passive BCI".

The citation is a scientific paper, accepted and cited by the scientific community, not by himself. The refernece is to see where the term is being used for the first time based on a scientific experiment that is explained on the paper. This paper is co created by other scientifics as well. Please review this BCI entry where Prof. Dr. Thorsten Zander is mentioned by a third party to be the first one to bring up this term, changing the field https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain%E2%80%93computer_interface

I understand the need to be riguurous to approve a draft, but in this case I find that the decision is not being true to the evidence we´re subitting. I´ve edited the narrative so it can only be about third party references, leaving only his awards, papers and accomplishments.

Please take some time to review Prof. Dr. Thorsten Zander´s wprk in order to understand his contribution to the neuroscientific field so we can move on with the draft.

Thank you.

Regards,

Mariela Zanderlabs (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again!

I´ve made the sugested edits (references, language) how can I request a re submission? Thanks! Zanderlabs (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zanderlabs! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thorsten Zander has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thorsten Zander. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thorsten Zander has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thorsten Zander. Thanks! 0xDeadbeef 12:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thank you for taking the time for reviewing the entry. I saw your latest commment questioning the reference about Prof. Dr. Zander claiming that we cannot reference his own paper to support that he´s the inventor of the term "passive BCI".

The citation is a scientific paper, accepted and cited by the scientific community, not by himself. The refernece is to see where the term is being used for the first time based on a scientific experiment that is explained on the paper. This paper is co created by other scientifics as well. Please review this BCI entry where Prof. Dr. Thorsten Zander is mentioned by a third party to be the first one to bring up this term, changing the field https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain%E2%80%93computer_interface

I understand the need to be riguurous to approve a draft, but in this case I find that the decision is not being true to the evidence we´re subitting. I´ve edited the narrative so it can only be about third party references, leaving only his awards, papers and accomplishments.

Please take some time to review Prof. Dr. Thorsten Zander´s wprk in order to understand his contribution to the neuroscientific field so we can move on with the draft.

Thank you.

Regards,

M. Zanderlabs (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thorsten O. Zander

Hello, Zanderlabs. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Thorsten O. Zander, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 23:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]