User talk:Zak123456789/Archives

Your RfA

I suggest you withdraw this now - it has no chance of succeeding when you have only one contribution to an article, and that wasn't properly formatted. Also your statement is somewhat misleading: I can't see any record of you ever asking questions, doing any editing, "mentoring" editors or offering advice. There is nothing in your talk page archive and what is there looks like you copied it from somewhere else as it has no edit history. Starting an RfA with no record of contributions and a misleading statement is not the way to go. You should spend six months or a year proving you have the experience in content creation and admin areas first. QU ^TalkQu 12:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have blanked Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Zak123456789, I assume that you intended to withdraw, and I have deleted that page and untranscluded it from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Hi. I've taken the liberty of removing your e-mail address from your userpage. Including it there is a bad idea for a number of reasons, including that you may be subjected to large amounts of spam if the address is "harvested" by a bot.

If you wish to use e-mail in connection with your Wikipedia editing, you can enable the "e-mail this user" option built in to the editor interface. This will allow editors to get in contact with you but allow you to decide whether to respond to them, and give our your address in doing so. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted deceptive editing

I have deleted User talk:Zak123456789/Archives which, as you know, was copied from an archive of User talk:NawlinWiki. This was unacceptable because it not only misrepresented your history at Wikipedia, but also misrepresented other editors as having posted messages to you that in fact they had never posted. Deliberately misrepresenting the actions of other editors is unacceptable, and a clear breach of the Wikimedia foundation's terms of service. In addition, it was a copyright infringement of the editors' posts. Wikipedia licenses all its contents, including talk page content, under a very broad free license, but it does not release content into the public domain, and one of the licensing conditions is that any reuse must be attributed. Furthermore, at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Zak123456789 you made patently false statements, claiming to have substantial editing experience, having mentored new editors, etc, and inviting us to scroll through your talk page archives to see the history of your interactions. This attempt to gain adminship by deliberate deception was bound to fail. In any request for adminship numerous editors look through the relevant editing history, and all of us who did so would have discovered very quickly that you were lying. At present, all I am doing about your dishonesty is deleting the fake talk page archive and posting this warning. However, if you do any more unacceptable editing at all you are likely to be blocked from editing without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Juicy Stuff

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Juicy Stuff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 11:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Same goes for the talk page on the article on parkour. Please focus on improving Wikipedia. Thanks. Soetermans. T / C 12:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dawnguard

It is not known yet, but it will be at least 30 days after the Xbox release. Microsoft have an exclusivity contract so that any DLCs have to be released on Xbox 30 days before any other platform releases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhiteWolf55555 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nile issacs mum

A tag has been placed on Nile issacs mum, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ducknish (talk) 11:41, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]