User talk:Zahid2005

Welcome

Hello, Zahid2005, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

March 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately I've had to revert/edit a number of your edits and I'd ask that you please be very careful about the information you add. A number of your additions were unsourced (please see WP:V and WP:RS), were signed in the main article space (signatures are only used on talk pages), were infobox-style information without a box and without any clear indication of what you were trying to do and some simply made little sense. You can use the Show preview button beneath each edit window to check what your edits will look like. Please be more careful or you'll find a large number of your edits will be reverted or deleted. Stalwart111 04:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. i understand and accept the points that you have discussed.--Zahid2005 (talk) 14:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing (immediate recreation of an article deleted at AfD). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zahid2005 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have created a new article about Datatune, this time backing up with an external source (a PC magazine named http://www.pc.co.il/ ), so please unblock me--Zahid2005 (talk) 10:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account was created with several others as a single purpose account to participate in an AFD. You then went on a string very poor grammar edits, and then recreated the article. My assumption is there is some kind of COI going on here, and I would be uncomfortable unblocking without some agreement to stay away from that article/topic. Kuru (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That reference, unless my PC is behaving strangely, appears to be writtten in Hebrew and is therefore for most of us difficult to assess. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:05, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]