User talk:Zaheerul Hassan
Improvement US-Pakistan Relations is Possible ?
Pak US relations remains very dicey since decades. After 9/11 Pakistan was forced to assist USA against Osama bin Laden (OBL) but major turn has been noticed after May 2, 2011 unilateral Washington’s action of killing of OBL in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The tensions in two countries further increased when American top political and military brass has threatened of launching ground attack on Pakistan. US also leveled baseless allegations against ISI for supporting Taliban and Haqqani Group. However Pakistan political and military leadership rejected all allegations and very strongly responded to US potent threat. Pakistani COAS stated that any misadventure against Pakistan will be dealt with full strength. At this time of the juncture, US probably realize the consequences of straight threat and continuously deteriorating relations between Pakistan and America, Hilary Clinton visited Pakistan to defuse the situation. Although diminution in tension has been observed after October 21, 2011 the visit of US sectary of State but still America has to do more in improving upon the bilateral relations between two frontline allies of GWOT. The confidence can be build up through releasing reaming funds in connection with military aid, assisting Pakistan in resolving Kashmir and water Issue, stop RAW and CIA for fomenting terrorism in Pakistan. Comment Please, [1]
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Zaheerul Hassan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --lTopGunl (talk) 11:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
2011 NATO attack in Pakistan
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:36, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Zaheerul Hassan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-encyclopedic--More of an essay or journalistic analysis than an encyclopedia article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —teb728 t c 08:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Zaheerul Hassan
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Zaheerul Hassan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 08:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)