User talk:Zaffar.awan

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kashmiris has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kashmiris was changed by Zaffar.awan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86432 on 2017-08-01T14:09:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kashmiris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zaffar.awan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zaffar.awan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Dravidian people

They should be treated as linguistic group. You have mentioned Aryan, but Ayran is also treated as linguistic group and not racial. Capitals00 (talk) 11:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article "Aryan" suggests racial basis of the term, and that is how it should be. Dravidian too is racial term.Zaffar.awan (talk) 15:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which sentence of Aryan article suggests so? You need to provide sources for Dravidian as well. Capitals00 (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to see the articles "Aryans" and "Aryan Race"... and there are plenty of sources for Dravidians on the internet. Zaffar.awan (talk) 01:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Augest 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kashmiris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 06:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kashmiris. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 02:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 02:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

are these sanctions already applied to me or not? Zaffar.awan (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is an alert. But, from now on, whatever you do will be carefully watched. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

alight man be a bit lenient with your policing, i am still trying to grasp things here. If it's ok to ask, are you a south Indian?Zaffar.awan (talk) 07:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What made you ask that question? Capitals00 (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you shake your head left - right while talking? Zaffar.awan (talk) 06:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent racist editing and personal attacks from both User:Zaffar.awan Top and this account. Note that both your accounts have been blocked, and that a block applies to the person, not to an account. This means you may not create any more accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 15:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]