User talk:Zackpowerhousr
|
RfA
[edit]I noticed that you are in the process of filling out a Request for Adminship. Before you finish it, I wanted to tell you that it is not likely to pass should you list the nomination as you are brand new to Wikipedia. I recommend that you read the Guide to requests for adminship before you proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Create a subpage
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Plrk (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to SandBox, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: SandBox was changed by Zackpowerhousr (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-09T00:21:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of WW2- A short artical
[edit]A tag has been placed on WW2- A short artical, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Roleplayer (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Evelution Verses Cristians
[edit]A tag has been placed on Evelution Verses Cristians, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted your move as About Cats does not follow the naming conventions in use. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
A strong suggestion
[edit]You have been doing various things here at Wikipedia that violate a number of different policies. I strongly suggest you read some or all of the helpful articles listed at the top of this page before you proceed further. Wikipedia welcomes new editors, but there are rules to be followed, and you've been breaking some of them early in your tenure here. If you keep it up, you may find yourself being blocked from editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please make yourself aware of naming conventions and editing styles that are common practice within Wikipedia. I would suggest reading the Manual of Style and The five pillars before doing any more editing. It seems you are making edits in good faith, so I doubt you would be blocked from edting as Reallyhick has suggested, but if you continue to edit in the same manner your edits will continue to be reverted... as I have done to your edits on D-Day. Thank you. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 03:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: Sorry, sir.
[edit]Re your message: A good starting place to learn about contributing to Wikipedia is all of the links that where in the welcome message that I left at the top of your talk page. Most of them are located in Help:Contents. If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)